Co-Joiner Class Action Details

Note 1 – since the Declaration of the “State of Emergency” in Victoria on 16 Mar 2020, I have been unemployed for a period of 257 days (inclusive of weekends). I have been employed for a period of 833 days (inclusive of weekends.

Note 2 – summary of TERMINATION of employment by Saputo Dairy Australia (SDA) due to non-compliance with ‘vaccine’ mandates

– 18 Oct 2021 – placed on LOA – Leave without pay
– 25 Oct 2021 – First warning letter (SDA to Kris Johnson)
– 01 Nov 2021 – Second warning letter (SDA to Kris Johnson)
– 08 Nov 2021 – Third warning letter (SDA to Kris Johnson)
– 12 Nov 2021 – Show cause response letter (Kris Johnson to SDA)
– 22 Nov 2021 – Termination letter (SDA to Kris Johnson)

Date of termination – effective COB, 23 Nov 2021

Note 3 – potential loss of earnings due to 257 days (including weekends) unemployed between 16 Mar 2020 to 10 Mar 2023

Benchmarked against my typical salary (e.g. $184K @ AGL) and/or hourly rate (e.g. $70 per hour @ OMEGA) received in my capacity as a Supply Chain professional I estimate my potential lost earnings to be between $90-120K.

Note 4 – on 28 Aug 2020, I issued the below communication multiple Members of the Victorian Legislative Council for their review and consideration.

Subject: Victorian Government Response to COVID-19 – Proposal to Amend the Public Health and Wellbeing Act

As a Victorian who cares about our health and wellbeing and the future of the State, I am greatly relieved by the recent good news that the Legislative Council will not be passing the Government’s proposed 12 month extension to its emergency powers under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 (“the Act”). May I thank and commend the Honourable Members committed to voting down the proposed ‘blank cheque’ extension.

Nevertheless, it appears that the exposure draft of the Public Health and Wellbeing Amendment (State of Emergency Extension and Other Matters) Bill 2020 proposes certain other amendments to the Act, chiefly:

· amendment to the definition of “serious risk to public health” in s.3 of the Act (cl.3(2)).

· insertion of the word “reasonably” before “necessary” in s.199(1)(b) of the Act (cl.6).

The existing definition of “serious risk to public health” establishes criteria that have remained unchanged in the Act since it was first introduced in 2008 by Premier Andrews, then Health Minister, and provides:

a material risk that substantial injury or prejudice to the health of human beings has or may occur having regard to the number of persons likely to be affected; the location, immediacy and seriousness of the threat to the health of persons; the nature, scale and effects of the harm, illness or injury that may develop; the availability and effectiveness of any precaution, safeguard, treatment or other measure to eliminate or reduce the risk to the health of human beings.

The proposed amendment is as follows.

Without limiting the definition of serious risk to public health in subsection (1), for the purposes of Division 3 of Part 10 COVID-19 may pose a material risk of substantial injury or prejudice to health of human beings even when the rate of community transmission of COVID-19 in Victoria is low or there have been no cases of COVID-19 in Victoria for a period of time.

The effect of the amendment would be to avoid the objective standard set by the existing provision and confer on the Government a practically unfettered discretion to determine whether a serious risk exists in respect of Covid. I note the terms “low” and “a period of time” in particular import a highly vague and subjective new standard. The amendment would thereby entitle the Government to prolong the state of emergency indefinitely, and so give it the extension it desires by another means.

Moreover, the proposal contains an implicit admission that the Government considers itself unable to meet the existing standard in relation to Covid. As you are aware, there has been a sustained lack of transparency and accountability in the Government’s refusal to engage with Parliament and to disclose the medical advice it relies upon. In particular, the Government has stifled discussion on the reliability of the RT-PCR test methods, which the Therapeutic Drugs Administration and the U.S. Centre for Disease Control have asserted are inconclusive and non-specific in identifying SARS-CoV-2. This is especially relevant in relation to the epidemiology.

Further, the proposals have not been subject to the usual extensive debate in both Houses and to committee scrutiny, nor it appears has an impact assessment been duly conducted under the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2008. Indeed, it is not clear that the Premier has conducted any consultation in relation to an amendment with such potential far-reaching and long-term effects.

The existing regime under Part 8 of the Act, together with the emergency powers provisions in Division 3 of Part 10, are more than sufficient to address risks posed by infectious diseases in this State. Oversight of the Government’s management, however, is now a more pressing issue.

The second proposed amendment would amend the Act to allow the Chief Health Officer to authorise officers to exercise any of the powers conferred on him under the state of emergency if he believes that it is reasonably necessary to grant an authorisation under this section to eliminate or reduce a serious risk to public health.

This proposal would allow the delegation of emergency powers, including the powers to detain groups of people, under less stringent conditions than is currently the case. It is not of great comfort to anyone that a Government which has acted with such a lack of accountability in relation to the bio-medical grounds to impose draconian measures which include mandatory public facemasks, curfews and lockdowns of particular buildings and suburbs, is now seeking to lower the standard by which it can enforce such measures.

Accordingly, the proposed amendments are glaring examples of Government overreach and should be rejected entirely.

May I now call on you, as a responsible Member of the Legislative Council, to reject all amendments proposed in the current Bill, and instead call for a well-defined pathway towards Victorian recovery and Government accountability. I also ask that these requests be tabled, with reference to the public e-petition at the Parliamentary website titled Cease the State of Emergency, no.219 to which I confirm I am a signatory to.

Yours sincerely,

Kris Johnson
johnsonkpg@outlook.com
0439 148 312

Churchill, VIC 3842

Note 5 – on 7 Oct 2020, I issued the below submission to the Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee

Subject: SARC submission – COVID-19 Omnibus (Emergency Measures) and Other Acts Amendment Bill 2020

Mark Gepp MLC, Chair, Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee

Cc: Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee

Related references:

A. PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES ACT 2003 – SECT 17
B. PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELLBEING ACT 2008 – SECT 5
C. PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELLBEING ACT 2008 – SECT 8
D. PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELLBEING ACT 2008 – SECT 9
E. COVID-19 Omnibus (Emergency Measures) and Other Acts Amendment Bill 2020
F. Open letter – An Alternative Medical Response to Covid-19
G. Statement of the Australian Covid Medical Network
H. COVID Response is Causing a New Health Crisis
I. Open Letter from Medical Doctors and Health Professionals to All Belgian Authorities and All Belgian Media
J. Victoria’s ‘COVID-19 Omnibus’ legislation an astonishing attack on democracy
K. Coronavirus Victoria: Lawyers challenge Andrews’ plan to lockup virus spreaders
L. Information on the use of surgical masks
M. A classic fallacious argument: “If masks don’t work, then why do surgeons wear them?”
N. Mandatory masks in school are a ‘major threat’ to children’s development, doctors warn
O. Masks are neither effective nor safe: A summary of the science
P. Stats Hold a Surprise: Lockdowns May Have Had Little Effect on COVID-19 Spread
Q. Doctor pleads with Daniel Andrews to ease restrictions over youth suicide concerns

I write to you today in response to the opportunity being afforded to the general public to lodge a submission to the Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee (SARC) for the COVID-19 Omnibus (Emergency Measures) and Other Acts Amendment Bill 2020 (Ref E.) which is currently scheduled for debate in the Legislative Council (LC) in the next sitting week of the Victorian Parliament. I do this noting the important function of the SARC as outlined in Ref A.

I wish to convey my opposition to this Bill in its entirety, and any amendments proposed by the Omnibus Bill to the Public Health and Wellbeing Act which would expand the persons who can be appointed as “Authorised officers” and the expansion of the powers of detention.

I note the following as part of this submission:

The Omnibus (Emergency Measures) Amendment Bill seeks to expand police powers and introduce a preventative detention regime under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act. But there are already powers to detain in the Public Health and Well-being Act.

Question: Why are these additional powers needed?

Liberty Victoria, The Victorian Bar, the Law Institute of Victoria and a number of retired judges and senior lawyers have expressed serious concerns about the Omnibus (Emergency Measures) Amendment Bill. Liberty Victoria is opposed to police officers automatically becoming authorised officers and say the approach to COVID-19 should be a health approach and not a policing approach: “We are of the view that only health workers or those with an expertise in health should be appointed authorised officers.”

The Omnibus (Emergency Measures) Amendment Bill would give police the power to pre-emptively detain anyone with COVID or their close contacts even if they haven’t broken the law. All that’s required is that the officer “reasonably believes” they might breach restrictions.

The Omnibus Bill allows the Secretary of the Department of Health to appoint virtually anyone (including private security guards, private citizens) as “authorised officers” with wide-ranging powers including entry, search, seizure and detention. And these powers may be exercised even if no breach of restrictions has occurred. It allows for “authorised officers” to pre-emptively detain a person they think may not comply.

I lieu of the above, I believe this Bill (as a minimum) should be subject to not only public submissions, but also a public hearing to ensure the key stakeholders (e.g. medical, legal, education, etc.) within the community are afforded the opportinty to appear before the SARC to ensure the required level of transparency and scritiny is achieved and the functions the SARC (as outlined in Ref A.) are adhered to.

Further more, and whilst I acknowledge this may be outside the scope of the SARC with respect to reviewing the COVID-19 Omnibus (Emergency Measures) and Other Acts Amendment Bill 2020, it is becoming increasingly apparent that many highly credentialled and esteemed medical professionals in Australia and abroad are calling into question the level of effectiveness of the current ‘package’ of restrictions (e.g. lockdowns, mandatory masks, etc.) currently in use in the state of Victoria and are effectively calling for their immediate cessation due to these measures being not only counterproductive, but possibly harmful, when benchmarked against the current (revised) risk profile of COVID-19.

It would appear that the immediate focus needs to be to facilitate an URGENT review of the current ‘package’ of restrictions in consultation with the many health professionals calling for such a review to take place, as this will ensure the right balance is struck, otherwise we run the risk of being too narrowly focussed on potentially granting additional powers to ‘authorised officers’ to effectively enforce restrictions and health orders which are being called out for immediate review.

Thank-you for your time, and I wish you well with the remainder of this important review process.

Regards,

Kris Johnson
johnsonkpg@outlook.com
Churchill, VIC 3842

Note 6 – on 15 Feb 2021, I issued the below communication to ALL sitting members of the Victorian Legislative Council

Subject: FOR ACTION – end the “State of Emergency” in Victoria

Dear members of the Victorian Legislative Council,

As a genuinely concerned citizen of the Morwell electorate, I have a responsibility to ensure that you are acting in the interests of your constituents (and the Victorian people in general with respect to this matter) by informing you of my view on issues that come before Parliament.

On 2nd of February 2021, Premier Daniel Andrews attempted to extend the “State of Emergency” until 15th of December 2021 with a bill he has introduced into Parliament. The bill is to be debated when the Parliament resumes (this week), and if passed, it will give him the Emergency Authority to enforce ongoing Coronavirus restrictions such as lockdowns, hotel quarantine, border controls, mandatory face masks, indoor and outdoor gathering limitations, and protest incitement arrests.

In accordance with the Charter of Human Rights VIC 2006, Article 5, 6, 10 and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 16, 17, 18 and 19 this bill will deprive every living Man and Woman of their basic human rights.

Also, I have completed some benchmarking against Part 2, Sections 5, 8 and 9 of the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 No. 46 of 2008 which states:

Part 2—Objective, principles and application

5 Principle of evidence based decision-making

Decisions as to—

(a) the most effective use of resources to promote and protect public health and wellbeing; and
(b) the most effective and efficient public health and wellbeing interventions—

should be based on evidence available in the circumstances that is relevant and reliable.

8 Principle of accountability

(1) Persons who are engaged in the administration of this Act should as far as is practicable ensure that decisions are transparent, systematic and appropriate.
(2) Members of the public should therefore be given—
(a) access to reliable information in appropriate forms to facilitate a good understanding of public health issues; and
(b) opportunities to participate in policy and program development.

9 Principle of proportionality

Decisions made and actions taken in the administration of this Act—

(a) should be proportionate to the public health risk sought to be prevented, minimised or controlled; and
(b) should not be made or taken in an arbitrary manner.

It is my personal assessment that both the Premier and Chief Health Officer, Brett Sutton have both failed to ensure that Sections 5 (Principle of evidence based decision-making), 8 (Principle of accountability) and 9 (Principle of proportionality) have been maintained as required by law throughout the last eleven (11) months of Victoria’s “State of Emergency”.

Also, it is a birthright of all Australian people to live their lives in freedom. This Bill will destroy the Freedom of Victorians and open the possibility to even more lockdown restrictions.

This will lead to increased rates of suicide, business insolvency, mental health concerns, poverty, and increased government spending on welfare for displaced workers.

You, as a member of Parliament, must implement the will of the Victorian People, against all internal party pressures, and should oppose this bill immediately and in its entirety!

I do not support any bill to this effect, and the Victorian “State of Emergency” should not be extended after 15th of March 2021.

As a Victorian, I demand a new State Election before this bill proceeds any further, as the Government has acted beyond its duty and must be replaced with those who shall implement the will of the electorate effectively and accurately.

If you support this Bill, you will lose my vote (where applicable), and the votes of many concerned Victorians.

If you oppose this Bill, please make a public statement of your position as soon as possible and encourage your colleagues to do the same.

Victoria Cannot Take Another Lockdown | Freedom Is Essential

Regards,

Kris Johnson (Morwell electorate, Victoria)
m. 0439 148 312
e. johnsonkpg@outlook.com

Note 7 – on 18 Feb 2021, I issued the below communication to Victorian CHO Brett Sutton

Subject: FORMAL REQUEST for provision of evidence and justification specific to ongoing face mask mandates in lieu of well-documented potential risks and harms from ongoing mask usage

For the attention of:

Dr. Brett Sutton (Chief Health Officer, Victoria)

Subject:

FORMAL REQUEST for provision of evidence and justification specific to ongoing face mask mandates in lieu of well-documented potential risks and harms from ongoing mask usage

Background:

In the interest of clarity, I write to you today in my capacity as a devoted family man (based in the Victorian electorate of Morwell), proactive member of the local community (when not in lockdown), a staunch advocate for child safety, a student of history and last but not least an Australian Veteran (Royal Australian Navy), to both express the grave concerns I have with respect to the ongoing mandatory face mask mandates (rules) and to formally seek clarity from you specific to the evidence and justification to these ongoing face mask mandates (as required by law).

I am very appreciative and mindful of the fact that you are extraordinarily busy, so I will take the liberty of sharing a very small sampling of my own research in an effort to justify what constitutes the source of my concerns with respect to mandatory masking.

With respect to the potential risks and harms caused by ongoing face mask usage, I would refer you to the following research papers:
Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 1: Friable mask particulate and lung vulnerability (September 13, 2020, Completed peer-reviewed and revised, September 24, 2020)
Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 2: Microbial challenges from masks (October 9, 2020. Completed peer-review and revised, October 15, 2020)
Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 3: Hypoxia, hypercapnia and physiological effects (November 2, 2020. Completed peer-review and revised, November 9, 2020)

I personally found the information comprised within the above papers to be of significant value with respect to educating myself with respect to potential risks and harms caused by ongoing mask usage.

I would also refer you to the following article which references the concerns raised by world renowned neurologist Margareta Griesz-Brisson specific to the dangers of the mandatory masking of society:

World-renowned neurologist Margareta Griesz-Brisson warns: Masks cause OXYGEN DEPRIVATION and PERMANENT NEUROLOGICAL DAMAGE, especially in the developing brains of children

With respect to the paramount importance of child safety, Margareta Griesz-Brisson provides the following important observations and feedback:

“For children and adolescents, masks are an absolute no-no. Children and adolescents have an extremely active and adaptive immune system and they need a constant interaction with the microbiome of the Earth. Their brain is also incredibly active, as it has so much to learn. The child’s brain, or the youth’s brain, is thirsting for oxygen. The more metabolically active the organ is, the more oxygen it requires. In children and adolescents every organ is metabolically active.

To deprive a child’s or an adolescent’s brain from oxygen, or to restrict it in any way, is not only dangerous to their health, it is absolutely criminal. Oxygen deficiency inhibits the development of the brain, and the damage that has taken place as a result CANNOT be reversed.

The child needs the brain to learn, and the brain needs oxygen to function. We don’t need a clinical study for that. This is simple, indisputable physiology. Consciously and purposely induced oxygen deficiency is an absolute deliberate health hazard, and an absolute medical contraindication.

An absolute medical contraindication in medicine means that this drug, this therapy, this method or measure should not be used, and is not allowed to be used.”

I’m sure you would agree that the information comprised within both the research papers listed specific to False safety and real dangers specific to masking, and the heartful warnings issued by Margareta Griesz-Brisson come from a genuine appreciation and understanding of the core principles of “First, Do No Harm!” with respect to health care.

Benchmarking:

In the interest of benchmarking, I would also like to draw your attention to a DHHS flyer Reduce your risk of coronavirus (March 2020 – 2001628_v1) which states “WEARING a face mask is not necessary if you are well.” which remains accessible via the dhhs.vic.gov.au website.

Informed consent with respect to medical devices:

As per the TGA Public Summary – ARTG Entry 339478 – Mask, surgical, single use (Product Category – Medical Device Class 1) the surgical mask is categorised as a Medical Device Class 1. It is my layman’s understanding that informed consent must be acquired with respect to the use of medical devices as summarised succinctly at Informed consent – Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care which states:

“Ensuring informed consent is properly obtained is a legal, ethical and professional requirement on the part of all treating health professionals and supports person-centred care.

Informed consent is a person’s decision, given voluntarily, to agree to a healthcare treatment, procedure or other intervention that is made:

Following the provision of accurate and relevant information about the healthcare intervention and alternative options available; and
With adequate knowledge and understanding of the benefits and material risks of the proposed intervention relevant to the person who would be having the treatment, procedure or other intervention.

At the Commission, we believe informed consent is a key quality and safety issue.

Good clinical practice involves ensuring that informed consent is validly obtained and appropriately timed.

Informed consent is integral to the right to information in the Australian Charter of Healthcare Rights, and recognised in Professional Codes of ConductExternal link. Additionally, the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards require all hospitals and day procedures services to have informed consent processes that comply with legislation, lawful requirements and best practice.”

Therefore, I would envisage that for informed consent to be achieved with respect to the medical device of a face mask, the wearer/s would need to have a genuine understanding of both the pros (benefits) and cons (risks/harms) benchmarked against the current risk profile?

Requests pertaining to the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 specific to mandatory masking:

Pursuant to the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 (reference B.), Part 2, Section 5 – Principle of evidence based decision-making states:

“Decisions as to—

(a) the most effective use of resources to promote and protect public health and wellbeing; and
(b) the most effective and efficient public health and wellbeing interventions—

should be based on evidence available in the circumstances that is relevant and reliable.”

Request: In lieu of the information provided above with respect to the potential risks and harms of ongoing mask usage, please provide your own evidence used to satisfy the requirement of Section 5 – Principle of evidence based decision-making.

Pursuant to the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 (reference B.), Part 2, Section 8 – Principle of accountability states:
“(1) Persons who are engaged in the administration of this Act should as far as is practicable ensure that decisions are transparent, systematic and appropriate.

(2) Members of the public should therefore be given—

(a) access to reliable information in appropriate forms to facilitate a good understanding of public health issues; and

(b) opportunities to participate in policy and program development.”

Request: Please provide the evidence used to justify the ongoing mask mandate in order to satisfy the requirement of transparency as outlined in Section 8 – Principle of accountability.

Pursuant to the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 (reference B.), Part 2, Section 9 – Principle of proportionality states:
“Decisions made and actions taken in the administration of this Act—
(a) should be proportionate to the public health risk sought to be prevented, minimised or controlled; and
(b) should not be made or taken in an arbitrary manner.”
Request: Please provide the evidence used to justify the ongoing face mask mandates to ensure Section 9 – Principle of proportionality is satisfied via benchmarking of the current risk profile thereby also demonstrating that the mandate has not been issued in a way that may be perceived as arbitrary*

* arbitrary (adjective) – based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason of system “an arbitrary decision”

Pursuant to the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 (reference B.), Part 8, Section 112 – Least restrictive measure to be chosen states:

“If in giving effect to this Division alternative measures are available which are equally effective in minimising the risk that a person poses to public health, the measure which is the least restrictive of the rights of the person should be chosen.”

Request: Naturally, once the requested information has been satisfied for Sections 5, 8 and 9, then it will be quite clear as to whether the necessary evidence in support of justification will confirm if Section 112 – Least restrictive measure to be chosen HAS or HAS NOT been achieved

Additional references:

Also, in the interest of clarity and transparency I wish to provide you with awareness of the fact I am fully conversant with the contents of the following additional references in support of this communication and request for further information:

– Concerned Lawyers Network letter Re: Notice of Liability & Potential Claims (6 Nov 2020)
– Concerned Lawyers Network follow up letter Re: Notice of Liability & Potential Claims (11 Dec 2020)
– Legislative Council e-Petition number 306 – Vote against the Public Health and Wellbeing Amendment (State of Emergency Extension) Bill 2021
– Dr. Sam Bailey – The Truth about PCR Tests (Jan 13, 2021)
– Dr. Sam Bailey – Covid-19: Behind the PCR Curtain (Feb 10, 2021)
– Cease and desist papers served on Prof. Dr. Christian Drosten by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich (19 Dec 2020)
– Principle 2: The Rule of Law – Australian Constitution Centre

I note the following with respect to e-Petition number 306, which unfortunately states:

“It is also of great concern that the Government has failed in its responsibility to table in Parliament documents that the Legislative Council called for on 2 September 2020, 16 September 2020 and 30 October 2020. The Council has clearly called for more transparency around decisions made under the State of Emergency.”

Please rest assure I have not included the above references in an attempt to come across as antagonistic, but rather to simply provide the necessary awareness of my own research with respect to these matters, which is inclusive of some of the “ground zero” type litigation being initiated by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich (in Germany and California) and some of the excellent presentations by Dr. Sam Bailey specific to PCR testing in support of establishing objective truth via the scientific method.

In lieu of the fact that you would already have the requested information on-hand (as required by law) specific to the ongoing mandatory masking mandates, it would be appreciated if you could please provide the requested response by COB Monday, 22 February 2021.

Thank-you for your time today, and I genuinely look forward to hearing from you by the nominated deadline.

Regards,

Kris Johnson
m. 0439 148 312
e. johnsonkpg@outlook.com

Related references:

– Concerned Lawyers Network letter Re: Notice of Liability & Potential Claims (6 Nov 2020)
– Concerned Lawyers Network follow up letter Re: Notice of Liability & Potential Claims (11 Dec 2020)
– Authorised Version No. 47 – Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 – No. 46 of 2008 (Authorised Version incorporating amendments as at 9 December 2020)
– Part 2 – Objective, principles and application
i. Section 5 – Principle of evidence based decision-making
ii. Section 8 – Principle of accountability
iii. Section 9 – Principle of proportionality
– Part 8 – Management and control of infectious diseases, micro-organisms and medical conditions
i. Section 112 – Least restrictive measure to be chosen
– Legislative Council e-Petition number 306 – Vote against the Public Health and Wellbeing Amendment (State of Emergency Extension) Bill 2021
– Dr. Sam Bailey – The Truth about PCR Tests (Jan 13, 2021)
– Dr. Sam Bailey – Covid-19: Behind the PCR Curtain (Feb 10, 2021)
– Cease and desist papers served on Prof. Dr. Christian Drosten by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich (19 Dec 2020)
– Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 1: Friable mask particulate and lung vulnerability (September 13, 2020, Completed peer-reviewed and revised, September 24, 2020)
– Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 2: Microbial challenges from masks (October 9, 2020. Completed peer-review and revised, October 15, 2020)
– Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 3: Hypoxia, hypercapnia and physiological effects (November 2, 2020. Completed peer-review and revised, November 9, 2020)
– DHHS flyer – Reduce your risk of coronavirus (March 2020 – 2001628_v1) which states “WEARING a face mask is not necessary if you are well.” which remains accessible via the dhhs.vic.gov.au website
– TGA Public Summary – ARTG Entry 339478 – Mask, surgical, single use (Product Category – Medical Device Class 1)
– Informed consent – Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care
– World-renowned neurologist Margareta Griesz-Brisson warns: Masks cause OXYGEN DEPRIVATION and PERMANENT NEUROLOGICAL DAMAGE, especially in the developing brains of children
– Principle 2: The Rule of Law – Australian Constitution Centre

Carbon copy listing:

The Hon. Jaclyn Symes – Attorney General (First Law Officer, Victoria)
The Hon. Martin Foley – Minister for Health
The Hon. Russell Northe – Member for Morwell
Ms Melina Bath MLC (Legislative Council – Eastern Victoria
Mr Jeff Bourman MLC (Legislative Council – Eastern Victoria)
The Hon. Jane Garrett (Legislative Council – Eastern Victoria)
The Hon. Edward O’Donohue (Legislative Council – Eastern Victoria)
Ms Harriet Shing (Legislative Council – Eastern Victoria)

Note 8 – on 28 Feb 2021, I issued the below correspondence to Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews

Subject: For the URGENT attention of the Victorian Premier – support with provision of information for mask mandates and State of Emergency extension

For the URGENT attention of:

The Hon. Daniel Andrews – Premier of Victoria

Objectives:

– Provision of formal correspondence to the Victorian Premier specific to:
– Request for support with provision of requested information from the Department of Health and Education specific to mask mandates; and,
– Provision of important information specific to the pending vote in the Legislative Council for the proposed extension to the State of Emergency

Table of contents in support of the stated Objectives:

– Request for support with provision of requested information from the Department of Health and Education specific to mask mandates
– Summary of correspondence to date (as of 28 Feb 2021) with:

– Chief Health Officer, Brett Sutton
– Minister for Health, Martin Foley
– Minister for Education, James Merlino

– Provision of important information specific to the pending vote in the Legislative Council for the proposed extension to the State of Emergency (SoE)

– Open letters from medical professionals

COVID Medical Network
Great Barrington Declaration
World Doctors Alliance
Belgium Doctors
Philippines Doctors
America’s Frontline Doctors

– Ask The Experts (Covid-19 Vaccine) presentation – World Doctors Alliance

– Statement on Virus Isolation (SOVI) by:

Sally Fallon Morwell, MA
Dr. Thomas Cowan, MD
Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD

– Inappropriate ‘Tweet’ from a sitting member of the Victorian Legislative Council via their official MP social media (Twitter) account

A. a. Summary of correspondence to date (as of 28 Feb 2021) with the Departments of Health and Education with respect to the mandatory masks mandates

Comment – my emailed communication listed a Table summarising my exchanges as at 28 Feb 2021

Request – due to the nature of my Request for Information (ROI) from both the Department of Health and Education, it would be appreciated if you could please request the respective Minister, or delegated representative from those departments to:

– Acknowledge receipt of my correspondence; and,
– Confirm when the requested information is likely to be provided

***

B. Provision of important information specific to the pending vote in the Legislative Council for the proposed extension to the State of Emergency (SoE)

a. Open letters from medical professionals (Australia and globally)

– COVID Medical Network – Statement of the Australian Covid Medical Network Ltd may be accessed HERE
– Great Barrington Declaration – letter may be accessed HERE
– World Doctors Alliance – letter may be accessed HERE
– Belgium Doctors – letter may be accessed HERE
– Philippines Doctors – letter may be accessed HERE

b. Ask The Experts (Covid-19 Vaccine) presentation – World Doctors Alliance (07 Dec 2020)

– The presentation (27:48) may be viewed HERE

The presentation is delivered by the following professionals from across the globe:

Comment – my emailed communication listed the thirty-three medical professionals whom spoke within the video presentation

c. Statement (Feb 2021) on Virus Isolation (SOVI) by:

Sally Fallon Morwell, MA
Dr. Thomas Cowan, MD
Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD

The SOVI may be accessed HERE (Note: I hyperlink was supplied to the SOVI page for review and consideration)

d. Inappropriate ‘Tweet’ from a sitting member of the Victorian Legislative Council via their official MP social media (Twitter) account

On the 18th of Sep 2020, a sitting member of the Victorian Legislative Council, Fiona Patten MP issued a Tweet that I personally believe to be conduct unbecoming of a member of State Parliament.

As per Image 1 below, the Tweet states:

“This arrived in the mail this morning no return address to thank them #straighttothepoolroom”

The offending tweet includes an image of what appears to be a “Certificate of Appreciation” from the SATANIC NETWORK VICTORIA.

The “Certificate of Appreciation” states:

“FIONA PATTEN

We acknowledge your valuable contribution at this time

Through your efforts we have achieved incredible levels of fear within the state of Victoria
Intense rates of suicide and violence unto which we can energetically feed and perform ritual under
Our power is increasing daily knowing that childhood energy is being violated and disrupted at fabulous levels
Vibrational fields of psychological torment have allowed us access to the darkest of realms

FOR THIS WE THANK YOU

MAY YOUR EFFORTS BE KNOWN FAR AND WIDE

YOUR SILENCE AND OBEDIENCE IS NOTED”

Please note, I am not in a position to either confirm or deny the authenticity of this “Certificate of Appreciation”, however even if it is not authentic and meant to be some sort of joke, then I’m sure you’d agree that a tweet from a sitting MP effectively advocating the abuse of children (childhood energy being violated and disrupted at fabulous levels) as something worthy of “appreciation” is highly inappropriate at any time, let alone during a time when many Victorians were genuinely struggling to cope during the lengthy lockdown periods in Victoria.

It is also noted that this completely insensitive and inappropriate tweet from a sitting MP was issued a few weeks after this particular MP played a key role in the 6-month extension of the State of Emergency powers in early Sep 2020.

It is also noted that this same MP is also heavily involved in the current negotiations with respect to the pending vote in the Legislative Council scheduled for Tuesday, 2 Mar 2021, and seems to enjoy the attention whilst baiting the general public with ever changing and floating goal posts with respect to her personal position on this matter.

Request – please request Fiona Patten MP proceed to remove this inappropriate and insensitive Tweet from her official MP Twitter account

Image 1 – Inappropriate and insensitive Tweet issued via the Official MP account of Fiona Patten MLC – screen shot acquired 28 Feb 2021 @ 9:23am

***

Thank-you for your time today, and I genuinely look forward to hearing from you in response to this correspondence.

Regards,

Kris Johnson
e. johnsonkpg@outlook.com

Carbon copy listing:

The Hon. Jaclyn Symes – Attorney General (First Law Officer, Victoria)
The Hon. Martin Foley – Minister for Health
The Hon. James Merlino – Minister for Education
The Hon. Russell Northe – Member for Morwell
Ms Melina Bath MLC (Legislative Council – Eastern Victoria)
Mr Jeff Bourman MLC (Legislative Council – Eastern Victoria)
The Hon. Jane Garrett (Legislative Council – Eastern Victoria)
The Hon. Edward O’Donohue (Legislative Council – Eastern Victoria)
Ms Harriet Shing (Legislative Council – Eastern Victoria)

Note 9 – on 23 Dec 2022 I sent the below query to the Victorian Department of Health

Subject: Query – COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ batch data

Good morning Department of Health (VIC),

Please confirm the process for me to ascertain the batches (e.g. Batch No.) my Pfizer COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ (x2) were from?

Thanks, and I look forward to your prompt reply.

Regards,

Kris Johnson
johnsonkpg@outlook.com

On 23 Dec 2022 I received the following automated reference number CM0040313, however as at 10 Mar 2023, I am yet to receive any definitive feedback in response to my query.

Note 10 – on 12 Nov 2021 I issued the below communication all five (5) MLC’s for Eastern Victoria

Subject: Request for you to CROSS THE FLOOR with respect to proposed PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELLBEING AMENDMENT (PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT) BILL 2021

To the Hon. Jane Garrett, Ms Harriet Shing, The Hon. Edward O’Donohue, Mr Jeff Bourman & Ms Melina Bath,

Related reference: A. PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES ACT 2003 – SECT 17 Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee (austlii.edu.au)

I, Kris Johnson, object unreservedly, to the proposed PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELLBEING AMENDMENT (PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT) BILL 2021 in any form.

It is a massive overreach of powers by the Victorian Government, particularly as matters dealing with Biosecurity is solely the domain of the Commonwealth, as stated in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, Chapter 1, Part V, 51 (ix).

Subsequently, it is the Biosecurity Act 2015 that governs Australia with regards to all things of a Biosecurity nature, including Human Biosecurity.

Only a delegation of powers by the Director of Biosecurity/Human Biosecurity to the States under the Biosecurity Act 2015, and an intergovernmental agreement, allows for the States to enact any legislation at a State level, and any such legislation can not exceed that of The Biosecurity Act 2015.

Therefore, the proposed Public Health and Wellbeing Amendment (Pandemic Management) Bill 2021 is an attempt to take control with absolute and blatant disregard to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act as well the Biosecurity Act 2015.

The Public Health and Wellbeing Amendment (Pandemic Management) Bill 2021 can NOT be allowed to pass.

Regards,
Kris Johnson
3842

Note 11 – on 28 Oct 2021 I issued the below correspondence to the Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee (VIC)

Subject: Unreserved objection to the proposed PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELLBEING AMENDMENT (PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT) BILL 2021

To Whom It May Concern (SARC);

Related reference: A. PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES ACT 2003 – SECT 17 Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee (austlii.edu.au)

I, Kris Johnson, object unreservedly, to the proposed PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELLBEING AMENDMENT (PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT) BILL 2021.

It is a massive overreach of powers by the Victorian Government, particularly as matters dealing with Biosecurity is solely the domain of the Commonwealth, as stated in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, Chapter 1, Part V, 51 (ix).

Subsequently, it is the Biosecurity Act 2015 that governs Australia with regards to all things of a Biosecurity nature, including Human Biosecurity.

Only a delegation of powers by the Director of Biosecurity/Human Biosecurity to the States under the Biosecurity Act 2015, and an intergovernmental agreement, allows for the States to enact any legislation at a State level, and any such legislation can not exceed that of The Biosecurity Act 2015.

Therefore, the proposed Public Health and Wellbeing Amendment (Pandemic Management) Bill 2021 is an attempt to take control with absolute and blatant disregard to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act as well the Biosecurity Act 2015.

The Public Health and Wellbeing Amendment (Pandemic Management) Bill 2021 can NOT be allowed to pass.

Yours sincerely,

Kris Johnson

Date: 28 October 2021

Post Code: 3842

Note 12 – on 22 Feb 2021 I issued the below communication to the Victorian Minister for Education:

Subject: FORMAL REQUEST for provision of education department risk assessments specific to the mandatory masking of Victorian school children

For the attention of:

The Hon. James Merlino – Minister for Education (Victoria)

Subject:

FORMAL REQUEST for provision of education department risk assessments specific to the mandatory masking of Victorian school children

Background:

In the interest of clarity, I write to you today in my capacity as a devoted family man (based in the Victorian electorate of Morwell), proactive member of the local community (when not in lockdown), a staunch advocate for child safety, a student of history and last but not least an Australian Veteran (Royal Australian Navy), to both express the grave concerns I have with respect to the ongoing mandatory face mask mandates (rules) and to formally seek provision of the associated risk assessments completed by the Victorian Department of Education specific to the mandatory masking of Victorian school children (aged 12 to 18 years).

I am very appreciative and mindful of the fact that you would be extraordinarily busy as Minister for both the education and mental health portfolios, so I will take the liberty of sharing a very small sampling of my own research in an effort to justify what constitutes the source of my concerns with respect to mandatory masking.

With respect to the potential risks and harms caused by ongoing face mask usage, I would refer you to the following research papers:

– Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 1: Friable mask particulate and lung vulnerability (September 13, 2020, Completed peer-reviewed and revised, September 24, 2020)
– Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 2: Microbial challenges from masks (October 9, 2020. Completed peer-review and revised, October 15, 2020)
– Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 3: Hypoxia, hypercapnia and physiological effects (November 2, 2020. Completed peer-review and revised, November 9, 2020)

I personally found the information comprised within the above papers to be of significant value with respect to educating myself with respect to potential risks and harms caused by ongoing mask usage.

I would also refer you to the following article which references the concerns raised by world renowned neurologist Margareta Griesz-Brisson specific to the dangers of the mandatory masking of society:

World-renowned neurologist Margareta Griesz-Brisson warns: Masks cause OXYGEN DEPRIVATION and PERMANENT NEUROLOGICAL DAMAGE, especially in the developing brains of children

With respect to the paramount importance of child safety, Margareta Griesz-Brisson provides the following important observations and feedback:

“For children and adolescents, masks are an absolute no-no. Children and adolescents have an extremely active and adaptive immune system and they need a constant interaction with the microbiome of the Earth. Their brain is also incredibly active, as it has so much to learn. The child’s brain, or the youth’s brain, is thirsting for oxygen. The more metabolically active the organ is, the more oxygen it requires. In children and adolescents every organ is metabolically active.

To deprive a child’s or an adolescent’s brain from oxygen, or to restrict it in any way, is not only dangerous to their health, it is absolutely criminal. Oxygen deficiency inhibits the development of the brain, and the damage that has taken place as a result CANNOT be reversed.

The child needs the brain to learn, and the brain needs oxygen to function. We don’t need a clinical study for that. This is simple, indisputable physiology. Consciously and purposely induced oxygen deficiency is an absolute deliberate health hazard, and an absolute medical contraindication.

An absolute medical contraindication in medicine means that this drug, this therapy, this method or measure should not be used, and is not allowed to be used.”

I’m sure you would agree that the information comprised within both the research papers listed specific to False safety and real dangers specific to masking, and the heartfelt warnings issued by Margareta Griesz-Brisson come from a genuine appreciation and understanding of the core principles of “First, Do No Harm!” with respect to health care.

Benchmarking:

In the interest of benchmarking, I would also like to draw your attention to a DHHS flyer Reduce your risk of coronavirus (March 2020 – 2001628_v1) which states “WEARING a face mask is not necessary if you are well.” which remains accessible via the dhhs.vic.gov.au website.

Informed consent with respect to medical devices:

As per the TGA Public Summary – ARTG Entry 339478 – Mask, surgical, single use (Product Category – Medical Device Class 1) the surgical mask is categorised as a Medical Device Class 1. It is my layman’s understanding that informed consent must be acquired with respect to the use of medical devices as summarised succinctly at Informed consent – Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care which states:

“Ensuring informed consent is properly obtained is a legal, ethical and professional requirement on the part of all treating health professionals and supports person-centred care.

Informed consent is a person’s decision, given voluntarily, to agree to a healthcare treatment, procedure or other intervention that is made:

Following the provision of accurate and relevant information about the healthcare intervention and alternative options available; and
With adequate knowledge and understanding of the benefits and material risks of the proposed intervention relevant to the person who would be having the treatment, procedure or other intervention.

At the Commission, we believe informed consent is a key quality and safety issue.

Good clinical practice involves ensuring that informed consent is validly obtained and appropriately timed.

Informed consent is integral to the right to information in the Australian Charter of Healthcare Rights, and recognised in Professional Codes of ConductExternal link. Additionally, the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards require all hospitals and day procedures services to have informed consent processes that comply with legislation, lawful requirements and best practice.”

Therefore, I would envisage that for informed consent to be achieved with respect to the medical device of a face mask, the wearer/s (or parents/guardian) would need to have a genuine understanding of both the pros (benefits) and cons (risks/harms) benchmarked against the current risk profile?

***

Formal request – please proceed to provide copies of ALL (dating back to the beginning of August 2020) department of education risk assessments completed specific to the mandatory masking of Victorian school children that will obviously be inclusive of potential harms from a physiological and psychological perspective.

***

In lieu of the fact that these risk assessments pertaining to the mandatory masking of Victorian school children would already be completed, it would be appreciated if you could please provide the requested response by COB Thursday, 25 February 2021.

Thank-you for your time today, and I genuinely look forward to hearing from you by the nominated deadline.

Regards,

Kris Johnson
m. 0439 148 312
e. johnsonkpg@outlook.com

Related references:

– Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 1: Friable mask particulate and lung vulnerability (September 13, 2020, Completed peer-reviewed and revised, September 24, 2020)
– Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 2: Microbial challenges from masks (October 9, 2020. Completed peer-review and revised, October 15, 2020)
– Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 3: Hypoxia, hypercapnia and physiological effects (November 2, 2020. Completed peer-review and revised, November 9, 2020)
– DHHS flyer – Reduce your risk of coronavirus (March 2020 – 2001628_v1) which states “WEARING a face mask is not necessary if you are well.” which remains accessible via the dhhs.vic.gov.au website
– TGA Public Summary – ARTG Entry 339478 – Mask, surgical, single use (Product Category – Medical Device Class 1)
– Informed consent – Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care
– World-renowned neurologist Margareta Griesz-Brisson warns: Masks cause OXYGEN DEPRIVATION and PERMANENT NEUROLOGICAL DAMAGE, especially in the developing brains of children

Carbon copy listing:

The Hon. Jaclyn Symes – Attorney General (First Law Officer, Victoria)
The Hon. Martin Foley – Minister for Health
The Hon. Russell Northe – Member for Morwell
Ms Melina Bath MLC (Legislative Council – Eastern Victoria
Mr Jeff Bourman MLC (Legislative Council – Eastern Victoria)
The Hon. Jane Garrett (Legislative Council – Eastern Victoria)
The Hon. Edward O’Donohue (Legislative Council – Eastern Victoria)
Ms Harriet Shing (Legislative Council – Eastern Victoria)

***

Note – I received a response from the Victorian Department of Education on 16 Mar 2021 per “DET Response – COR2170483”

Note 13 – on 24 Feb 2021 I issued the below communication to the Victorian Minister for Health

Subject: Re: FORMAL REQUEST for provision of evidence and justification specific to ongoing face mask mandates in lieu of well-documented potential risks and harms from ongoing mask usage

FOLLOW-UP DUE TO NON-REPLY – 24 Feb 2021

The Hon. Martin Foley MP – Minister for Health;

Disappointingly, to date, I am yet to receive any acknowledgement (or response) of my correspondence dated Thursday, 18 Feb 2021 (3:29pm) from either yourself (Minister for Health) or the Chief Health Officer, Brett Sutton.

I would like to think that correspondence detailing the potential irreversible harms to children specific to oxygen deprivation (Neurologist Margareta Griesz-Brisson) would warrant some attention.

It would be appreciated if you could please:

– Acknowledge receipt of my correspondence dated Thursday, 18 Feb 2021 (3:29pm); and,
– Confirm if you have on forwarded my correspondence to the Chief Health Officer, Brett Sutton as politely requested on Friday, 19 Feb 2021 (4:58pm)

Thank-you for your time, and I look forward to your prompt confirmation and reply.

Regards,

Kris Johnson
johnsonkpg@outlook.com

***

Note – I received a response from the Department of Health on 13 Apr 2021 per “Ministerial Correspondence – BAC-CO-11416”

Note 14 – two relevant and excellent resources are:

1. Katherine Watt (Legislative framework analysis) – https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/
2. Sasha Latypova (Contract analysis) – https://sashalatypova.substack.com/

Note 15 – in late Jan / early Feb 2021 (as best as I can recall) I initiated a formal Hazard report myHSE 20066914 pertaining to the “Potential risks/harms from ongoing/mandatory use of face masks/coverings” at my then place of employment being AGL Energy Limited.

The response received from the site based Health and Safety Business Partner post consultation with the Incident Management Team “Commander” was to effectively advise “mandatory masks were necessary because VIC CHO Brett Sutton said so”.

This sub-par ‘response’ to my formal Hazard report was instrumental in me escalating my concerns specific to mandatory masking directly to the VIC CHO Brett Sutton per my emailed communication dated 18 Feb 2021.

It is to be noted that the eventual response received by the Department of Health on 13 Apr 2021 appeared to be the result of the Minister’s (Health) follow up. At no time did I receive a direct and detailed response from the VIC CHO Brett Sutton, as clearly requested.

Note 15 – employment terminated by Saputo Dairy Australia – related file No. 1

File: SDA-Vic-employee-letter-Authorised-Worker-mandatory-vaccination-requirement_7Oct2021_FINAL.pdf

7 October 2021

Dear colleagues

The purpose of this letter is to update you on the Victorian Government’s announcement regarding mandatory vaccination for authorised workers and how Saputo Dairy Australia (SDA) intends to comply with these requirements.

What are the requirements?

On 1 October 2021, the Victorian Government announced that all “Authorised Workers” in Melbourne and regional Victoria must have their first COVID-19 vaccine dose by 15 October in order to continue working onsite and will need to be fully vaccinated by 26 November.

SDA employees are “Authorised Workers” essential to the operation of our business as an Authorised Provider. It is important to note that the Authorised Worker vaccination requirement only applies to Authorised Workers who cannot work from home.

This means that any person working at a Victorian SDA site or AG Warehouse store will be required to receive their first COVID-19 vaccination dose by 15 October and be fully vaccinated by 26 November to continue attending our worksites.

The mandate will also apply to any office-based employees who are currently working at a site or intend on visiting a site (including Freshwater Place and the Allansford office).

What happens next?

We request that you provide us with evidence of having had your first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by 15 October and evidence of your second dose by 26 November.

Acceptable evidence includes a letter from a medical practitioner, a certificate of immunisation or an immunisation history statement obtained from the Australian Immunisation Register (available through Medicare online or your MyGov account).

You can provide this information to us in a number of ways, including:

a) Email a copy to Human Resources at SDACOVIDVaccine@saputo.com;
b) Text a copy to Human Resources at 0498 001 995; or
c) Give a copy to your supervisor or manager (who will forward it to Human Resources).

Are there any exemptions to the vaccination requirement?

At this stage, we understand the only exemption to the mandatory vaccination requirement will be a certificate from a medical practitioner that a person is unable, due to a medical contraindication, to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

If you cannot be vaccinated due to a medical reason, you will need to provide us with this certificate.

Please note, there are no exemptions for not wanting to receive the vaccine due to personal preferences.

Why should I get vaccinated?

As confirmed by health authorities, the vaccines available in Australia are effective at preventing severe illness, hospitalisation and death from COVID-19, which is the goal of the national COVID-19 vaccination program.

By receiving the vaccine, you are helping to play your role in protecting our workforce and community. The more people who are vaccinated, the more protected our community will be. When enough people in the community are vaccinated, the virus can’t spread as easily.

For more information regarding the virus, health and the vaccination, please speak to your health care professional or visit: www.health.gov.au.

Where can I get vaccinated?

Information about COVID-19 vaccines, including how to book and appointment availability can be found at: www.coronavirus.vic.gov.au/vaccine.

What happens if I refuse to get vaccinated or share my vaccination details?

It is important to note that SDA has not mandated the COVID-19 vaccine, this is a direction from the Victorian Government. SDA is required to follow the Victorian Government’s public health directions, the same as any other law.

Therefore, if you refuse to get vaccinated or share your vaccination details with us by the required dates, you will not be permitted to attend work onsite until such time as you become vaccinated or share your vaccination evidence with us.

COVID Special Leave Changes

As a reminder, if you are unable to book a COVID-19 vaccination appointment outside of work hours, we are offering up to 4 hours paid special leave for you to receive each vaccine dose. Please speak with your supervisor to ensure your appointment is at a mutually agreed time.

Now that COVID-19 vaccinations are increasingly available to all employees, changes will also be occurring to our COVID Special Leave policy.

To align with the Victorian Government’s mandatory vaccination date for receiving your first dose, employees will no longer be entitled to access COVID special leave unless they have had at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.

This change to the COVID Special Leave entitlement applies to all employees irrespective of whether you are currently working from home or working at a site.

Your Privacy

Information in relation to your COVID-19 vaccine status will be collected to ensure SDA complies with the Victorian Government’s announcement.

Copies of your vaccine status information will be electronically stored on your personnel file, which is only accessible by the Human Resources team. Whilst SDA will limit the use and disclosure of your vaccination status information, your manager or supervisor and members of senior management may be made aware of your vaccination status for the purpose of complying with public health orders, understanding the vaccination status of the SDA workforce and ensuring your ongoing ability to work at SDA.

What if I have further questions?

We are still waiting on full details, including the public health order, to be published by the Victorian Government. We know that you will have many questions and we will share further relevant information with you in the coming days.

In the meantime, we encourage you to have a discussion with your manager / supervisor or HR BP. We are committed to having mutually respectful conversations with you as we navigate through complying with this government requirement.

Please continue to look out for yourself and each other.

Kind regards

Terri Bryant-Harrell
SDA Human Resources Director

Note 16 – employment terminated by Saputo Dairy Australia – related file No. 2

File: SDA-Mandatory-Vaccination-FAQsGuide_EMPLOYEES-11Oct2021_FINAL.pdf

Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination FAQ’s

Victoria’s mandatory vaccination health direction

1. What is the Victorian Government’s mandatory vaccination requirement?

– On 1 October, the Victorian Government announced mandatory vaccination requirements for all Authorised Providers and Authorised Workers who are not currently working from home. Very limited exceptions apply.
– Following this announcement, the Chief Health Officer of Victoria released COVID-19 Mandatory Vaccination (Workers) Directions on 8 October. The Direction imposes obligations on SDA, as an employer, to ensure certain “Workers” are vaccinated.
– Pursuant to the Direction, SDA is not permitted to allow any Worker to work outside of their home unless they have either:
o had their first COVID-19 vaccine dose by Friday, 15 October 2021; or
o have a booking to receive their first COVID-19 vaccine dose by Friday, 22 October 2021.
– From Friday, 26 November 2021, the requirement will increase to having had two doses, for all Workers.

2. Who does the health Direction apply to?

• The health Direction applies to all “Workers” in metropolitan Melbourne and regional Victoria.

3. Who is a “Worker”?

– The Direction defines a “Worker” as a person identified in the Direction and it includes:
o manufacturing workers, including anyone who works at or in connection with, a premises used for production or processing, including food;
o agricultural workers, including those persons who work in connection with food safety;
o a person conducting farming activities;
o freight workers, including services provided by transport, freight or logistics drivers;
o repair and maintenance workers, including commercial cleaning, vehicle repairs and critical repairs for the safety of any premises;
o retail facilities, including retail premises which provide ‘click and collect’ services and petrol stations;
and
o any person who works at or in connection with a wholesale or distribution facility.
– This means all SDA employees, including AG Warehouse employees, are “Workers” for the purposes of the Direction.

4. What does this mean for SDA?

– Following the Direction, SDA is not permitted to allow any SDA employee who is unvaccinated to work outside of the employee’s home.
– This means if an SDA employee is not vaccinated, they will not be permitted to conduct any work for us outside of their own home. Such employees will not be permitted to go to work at any SDA premises, including sites, offices and AG Warehouse retail stores, or conduct any work for SDA outside of their home.
– If your role requires you to attend an SDA premises, including a site, office or AG Warehouse retail store, you must get vaccinated in order to continue working at that SDA premises.
– If your role requires you to visit customers, suppliers or conduct any work for SDA in the field, then you must get vaccinated in order to continue working in the field.

5. Why should I get vaccinated?

As confirmed by health authorities:
– COVID-19 vaccines approved for use in Australia have met strict safety standards. The Federal Government follows rigorous regulatory procedures to ensure that all vaccines supplied are effective and safe for use.
– The goal of the COVID-19 vaccination program is to ensure that the population is protected from severe illness, hospitalisation and death from COVID-19.
– By receiving the vaccine, you are helping to play your role in protecting our workforce and community.
– The more people who are vaccinated, the more protected our community will be. When enough people in community are vaccinated, the virus can’t spread as easily.
– For more information regarding the virus, health and the vaccination, please speak to your health care professional or visit: www.health.gov.au.

6. Does the Direction apply to Victorian office employees or visits to head office?

– The Direction applies to any SDA employee who needs to leave their home to conduct work for us. This includes any office-based employees who are currently working from home but are required to, or wish to, physically attend an SDA site or office.
– This is the case even if the visit to office or site is a once-off or currently an infrequent occurrence.
– If your role is currently 100% work from home and you do not intend to conduct any work for us outside of your own home, at this stage, you do not need to comply with the mandatory vaccination requirement.
– Notwithstanding this, you may wish to consider that even if your role is currently 100% work from home due to lockdown orders, you will not be permitted to go to work or even visit any SDA premises, including sites, offices and AG Warehouse retail stores, or conduct any work for us outside of your home without being vaccinated.
– On this basis, we encourage all employees to get vaccinated if you are able to, even if the Direction does not specifically apply to you at this time.

7. Is it a requirement for SDA employees who are not in Victoria to get vaccinated?

– It is important to note that SDA is not imposing the mandatory vaccination requirement, it is a Victorian Government requirement.
– NSW Health has a requirement that all authorised workers who live in declared local government areas (LGA) of concern must not leave that LGA for work unless they have had at least 1 dose of a COVD-19 vaccine. This has affected our NSW employees.
– Currently there are no mandatory COVID-19 vaccination requirements affecting SDA employees in Western Australia, Queensland or Tasmania.
– There are mandatory vaccination requirements applicable to freight drivers who cross the Victorian, NSW and South Australian borders.

8. I currently live in another state, however will travel to Victorian SDA sites in the future. Am I required to be vaccinated and follow the Victorian health direction?

– Yes. If you are visiting Victoria for the purposes of carrying out work for SDA, we will be required under the Direction to ensure that you are vaccinated.

9. On what legal basis has the Victorian Government issued a Direction for mandatory vaccinations?

– The Victorian Government has declared a ‘state of emergency’ under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 (Vic). Pursuant to this law, the Chief Health Officer of Victoria has the power to issue health directions, which are legal directions that must be followed, the same as any other law.
– The Chief Health Officer has issued the COVID-19 Mandatory Vaccination (Workers) Directions, which requires all defined “Workers” to have their first vaccination dose by 15 October 2021 or be booked in for their first vaccination dose by 22 October 2021, and be fully vaccinated by 26 November 2021.
– Pursuant to this Direction, we have a legal obligation to collect, record and hold vaccination information and ensure unvaccinated workers are not performing any work for us outside of their own homes, unless they have a specified exemption.

Getting vaccinated

10. Where can I get vaccinated?

– There are vaccine appointments available across Victoria. The Victorian government announced additional Pfizer and Moderna doses available at state clinics. You can book a COVID-19 vaccine appointment through the Government Vaccine hubs, a local pharmacy or a local GP.
– Information about COVID-19 vaccines, including how to book and appointment availability can be found at: www.coronavirus.vic.gov.au/vaccine.

11. What date do I need to be vaccinated by?

– SDA is not permitted to allow any SDA employee to work outside of their home unless they have either:
o had their first COVID-19 vaccine dose by Friday, 15 October; or
o have a booking to receive their first COVID-19 vaccine dose by Friday, 22 October.
– From Friday, 26 November, the requirement will increase to having had two doses, for all SDA employees.

12. What evidence is required to show I have been vaccinated?

– Your vaccine information may be recorded in a variety of ways. Examples of evidence that we will accept include a letter from a medical practitioner, a certificate of immunisation or an immunisation history statement obtained from the Australian Immunisation Register (available through Medicare online or your MyGov account).
– For instructions on how to access your Medicare or MyGov account, please visit Services Australia at:
o www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/individuals/subjects/getting-help-during-coronavirus-covid-19/covid-19-vaccinations/how-get-proof
o www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/individuals/online-help/create-mygov-account
– Please see the ‘How to Share Vaccination Certificate’ guide for instructions on pg 8.

13. How do I submit my vaccination status information to SDA?

– To comply with the Direction, we request that you provide us with evidence of having had at least your first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by 15 October and evidence of your second dose by 26 November.
– Alternatively, you must provide us with evidence of your booking to receive your first COVID-19 vaccine dose by 22 October.
– You can provide this information to us in a number of ways, including:
o Email a copy to Human Resources at SDACOVIDVaccine@saputo.com;
o Text a copy to Human Resources at 0498 001 995; or
o Give a copy to your supervisor or manager (who will forward it to our Human Resources team).
– Please see the ‘How to Share Vaccination Certificate’ guide for instructions on pg 8.

14. What if the Direction doesn’t currently apply to me but I want to share my vaccination information with SDA?

– We encourage all employees to get vaccinated if you are able to. You can send your vaccination information to us, even if the Direction does not specifically apply to you at this time.
– Your vaccination status will be held and treated in the same way as persons who the Direction does apply to.

15. What if I can’t get a vaccine appointment by the 15 October first dose deadline?

– Anyone with a booking between 15 October and 22 October will still be allowed to conduct work for SDA outside of their home, including going to work at an SDA site, office or AG Warehouse retail store.
– After 22 October, only those who’ve had at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose will be permitted to conduct work for SDA outside of their home, including going to work at an SDA site, office or AG Warehouse retail store.
– There are vaccine appointments available across Victoria. The Victorian government announced additional Pfizer and Moderna doses available at state clinics. You can book a COVID-19 vaccine appointment through the Government Vaccine hubs, a local pharmacy or a local GP.
– Information on COVID-19 appointment availability across Victoria can be found online at: www.coronavirus.vic.gov.au/vaccine

16. What happens if I’m only partially vaccinated by the 26 November full vaccination deadline?

– If you are not fully vaccinated by 26 November, you will not be permitted to conduct work for SDA outside of your home. You will not be permitted to work at an SDA site, office or AG Warehouse retail store.
– There are vaccine appointments available across Victoria. The Victorian government announced additional Pfizer and Moderna doses available at state clinics. You can book a COVID-19 vaccine appointment through the Government Vaccine hubs, a local pharmacy or a local GP.
– Information on COVID-19 appointment availability across Victoria can be found online at: www.coronavirus.vic.gov.au/vaccine

17. What if I can’t have the COVID-19 vaccine for a particular reason or due to a medical condition?

– There are no exemptions under the Direction to the mandatory vaccination requirement for persons who do not want to receive the vaccine due to personal preferences.
– There are only two medical exemptions under the Direction, which are:
o certification from a medical practitioner that a person is unable, due to a medical contraindication, to receive the COVID-19 vaccine; or
o certification from a medical practitioner that you are unable to receive a dose or further dose of a vaccine due to an acute medical illness (including where you have been diagnosed with COVID-19).
– If you cannot be vaccinated due to a medical contraindication or acute medical illness, you will need to provide us with certification from a medical practitioner.
– Otherwise, only very limited other exemptions apply, such as if you miss the first dose deadline because you were required to be in self-quarantine pursuant to the Diagnosed Persons and Close Contacts Directions, or SDA may permit you onto site in certain emergency situations or critical unforeseen circumstances.
– In the first instance, a request should be made to your direct supervisor / manager with supporting evidence. Please also send your exemption evidence to SDACOVIDVaccine@saputo.com for the HR team to make an assessment and decision.

18. What is a medical contraindication?

– The accepted medical contraindications are defined in the Direction and includes a limited set of circumstances where a person may not be able to receive any COVID-19 vaccine, including, for example, anaphylaxis after a previous dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.
– If you believe you have a medical contraindication to one or more of the COVID-19 vaccines, you should seek advice from your medical practitioner.

19. If I have a medical exemption, can I still come to work at an SDA work site?

– Yes. If you meet the evidence requirements of the medical exemption and have given this evidence to us, you can still attend an SDA work site.
– Workers who have provided required evidence of a medical exemption still need to follow all other government health directions (such as wearing a face mask) and SDA COVID-19 safety control measures in place.

20. What if I don’t consent to give SDA my vaccination information?

– If you refuse to provide us with your vaccination information, the Direction requires us to treat you as an unvaccinated person and you will not be permitted to conduct any work for us outside of your home, including attending work at any SDA premises.

21. What are the consequences if I choose not to get vaccinated or refuse to disclose my vaccination status?

– There are no exemptions under the Direction to the mandatory vaccination requirement for persons who do not want to receive a COVID-19 vaccine due to personal preferences.
– If you do not provide us with either:
o evidence that you meet the mandatory vaccination requirement by 15 October (or, if applicable, evidence of your booking to receive your first COVID-19 vaccine dose by 22 October) and 26 November respectively; or
o evidence you have an exemption under the Direction, then you will not be permitted to conduct work for SDA outside of your home.
– You will not be permitted to work at an SDA site, office or AG Warehouse retail store until you either become vaccinated and share your vaccination evidence with us, or provide us with evidence of an exemption under the Direction. You will not be paid during this time.
– Our General Leave Policy and existing arrangements continue to apply.
– We recommend you book your COVID-19 vaccine appointment if you haven’t yet done so. If you are hesitant or have concerns, we can support you to access government and health authorities’ advice that gives you factual information about the safety and efficacy of the available vaccines.
– Where an employee is required but cannot attend our worksites for an extended period of time due to their vaccine status not being compliant, we may need to review their ongoing suitability for employment.

22. What happens if we are unable to run production due to employees choosing not to be vaccinated?

– If an SDA employee has not had their vaccinations by the deadlines or has not obtained a certification from a medical practitioner that confirms a medical exemption under the Direction, we will not be permitted to let that person work at an SDA site, office or AG Warehouse retail store.
– In these circumstances, we will need to assess the labour impacts on certain shifts and where necessary mitigate any impact.

23. I do not have a Medicare card can I still get the vaccine?

– Yes, you can still get the vaccine.
– When booking your appointment online, you will need to select that you do not have a Medicare number and the clinics that do not require Medicare will populate the next available booking timeslots.
– Use the Vaccine Clinic Finder tool to locate appointments near you: covid-vaccine.healthdirect.gov.au/eligibility

24. Will I be given time off to get the COVID-19 vaccine?

– Yes, if you are unable to book a COVID-19 vaccination appointment outside of work hours, we are offering up to 4 hours paid COVID special leave for you to receive each vaccine dose.
– Please speak with your supervisor to ensure your appointment is at a mutually agreed time.

25. What happens with COVID special leave?

– From 22 October, changes will be occurring to our COVID special leave policy. Employees will no longer be entitled to access COVID special leave unless you have had at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine and the second dose by 26 November.
– This change to the COVID special leave entitlement applies to all employees, irrespective of whether you are currently working from home, a site, an office or AG Warehouse retail store.

26. What if I feel unwell after getting the vaccine?

– If you experience a potential side effect after being vaccinated, which is outside the common reactions to the vaccine as advised by the Department of Health (e.g. pain, redness and/or swelling at the needle site, headache, mild fever), please seek medical attention.
– If you are medically certified not to attend work due to a vaccine reaction, you will be covered by our COVID-19 special leave for up to 14 calendar days.
– The Australian Government has also established a ‘No Fault COVID-19 Indemnity Scheme’, which will provide Australians with access to compensation for claims above $5,000 related to the COVID-19 vaccine program. Further information can be found here: health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccine-claims-scheme

Privacy and your health information

27. What health information will you be collecting from me?

– We will only collect the minimum amount of personal information reasonably necessary to ensure we comply with the Chief Health Officer’s COVID-19 Mandatory Vaccination (Workers) Directions.
– SDA is obliged, pursuant to the Direction, to collect, record and hold each Worker’s vaccination information.
– This information will include your name, vaccine name, vaccination status (Dose 1, Dose 2 or exemption), and date of most recent vaccination.

28. I don’t feel comfortable providing personal health information to you. Can I show you my vaccine certificate or booking confirmation, but not provide a copy for you to store in my employee record?

– No. The Direction requires that we collect, record and hold vaccine information.

29. How will you store this information, who will be able to access it and how will it be used?

– Once we have collected your vaccination status, the information will be electronically stored on your personnel file (employee record), which is only accessible by SDA’s Human Resources team.
– Whilst we will limit the use and disclosure of your vaccination status information, your manager or supervisor and members of senior management may be made aware of your vaccination status for the purpose of complying with health directions (and any other relevant laws), understanding the vaccination status of the SDA workforce and ensuring your ongoing ability to work at SDA.

Visitors and contractors and other third parties

30. Do customers to our AG Warehouse stores need to be fully vaccinated?

– There is currently no legal requirement that customers entering an AG Warehouse store must be vaccinated.
– However, they are required to wear a mask, check in using the QR code and follow all other COVID control protocols that we have in place, including social distancing where possible and practicing good hygiene.

31. Do our suppliers need to be vaccinated? Is it our responsibility to check?

– Farmer suppliers are considered “Workers” under the COVID-19 Mandatory Vaccination (Workers) Directions, however it is their responsibility to ensure that they, and their employees, comply with the Direction.

32. I am a contractor at an SDA site, do I need to share my vaccination status with SDA?

– No. At this stage, SDA is only collecting the vaccine information of our own employees. It is expected that your employer will collect this information from you.

33. I work at SDA’s Kiewa site for Danone Murray Goulburn (DMG), do I need to give SDA my vaccination information?

– If you are employed by DMG, it is DMG’s responsibility to collect your vaccination information.
– If you are employed by SDA, but perform work for DMG, SDA will collect your vaccination information.

SDA’s COVID-19 safety control measures

34. Can I remove my mask once I am vaccinated?

– No, you need to continue wearing a mask in line with government public health directions.

35. What other safety measures will SDA put in place?

– Being vaccinated is just one of the control measures that can help protect our employees against COVID-19. At SDA, we also continue to maintain a broad range of other safety guidelines to reduce the risk of COVID-19 in our workplaces.
– We are regularly reviewing our COVID-Safe plans and we will continue to adapt and update our ways of working to reduce the risks of COVID-19 in our workplaces.

Note – the final page of the document provided screen shots of:

– Accepted Vaccination Certificates
– MYGOV WEBSITE – Email PDF COVID-19 digital certificate or immunisation history statement

Note 17 – employment terminated by Saputo Dairy Australia – related file No. 3

25 October 2021

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

Kris Johnson
Address details

DELIVERED VIA EMAIL

Dear Kris,

FIRST WARNING

On 8 October 2021, the Chief Health Officer of Victoria released COVID-19 Mandatory Vaccination (Workers) Directions (‘the Directions’). Saputo Dairy Australia (‘SDA’) is required to comply with the Directions.

Pursuant to the Directions, if an SDA employee is not vaccinated, or refuses to disclose their vaccination status to SDA, they will not be permitted to go to work at any SDA premises, including sites, offices and AG Warehouse retail stores, or conduct any work for SDA outside of their home, until they are vaccinated and provide evidence of their vaccination status to us.

You were informed of these requirements in correspondence issued to you on 7 October 2021, and in a Frequently Asked Questions document issued to you on 11 October 2021. Furthermore, I discussed this requirement with you and the consequences of not complying on Thursday October 21.

It is an inherent requirement of your role that you are able to lawfully attend an SDA workplace. If you are unable to do so, you will not be paid. It is also a requirement of your role that you comply with our Code of Ethics, including compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.

Since you have failed or refused to obtain a COVID-19 vaccination, or provide us with evidence of your vaccination status, you have therefore made yourself unable to meet the inherent requirements of your role.

You are hereby directed to provide us with the information required by the Directions to ensure you are able to lawfully attend SDA worksites and perform the inherent requirements of your role. An ongoing failure to do so will leave us with no choice but to review your ongoing employment with SDA.

You are hereby on notice, that you have 1 further week in which to provide vaccination evidence to SDA in compliance with the Directions above. If you fail or refuse to provide this information as directed, it may lead to further disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment.

A further copy of the Frequently Asked Questions document, setting out how SDA complies with the Directions, is attached again for your reference.

We wish to advise that a free and confidential counselling service is available for Saputo employees that you may wish to access. The Employee Assistance Program is available to you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and can be contacted on 1300 687 327.

Peter Dyson
IBL Regional Manager – East

Note 18 – employment terminated by Saputo Dairy Australia – related file No. 4

1 November 2021

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

Kris Johnson
Address details

DELIVERED VIA EMAIL

Dear Kris,

SECOND WARNING

I refer to the first warning issued to you on 25 October 2021.

Since that time you have continued to fail or refuse to obtain a COVID-19 vaccination or provide us with evidence of your vaccination status in compliance with the COVID-19 Mandatory Vaccination (Workers) Directions (‘the Directions’).

We remind you that your conduct means you are unable to meet the inherent requirements of your role, whilst also being a failure to follow our lawful and reasonable directions and the terms of our Code of Ethics as it relates to compliance with applicable laws and regulations. You will not be paid during this time.

If this continues your ongoing employment with Saputo Dairy Australia may be terminated.

To avoid this occuring, we are providing you with a final 1 additional week in which to provide vaccination evidence to SDA in compliance with the Directions above. If you fail or refuse to provide this information as directed within the timeframe, you will be required to show cause why your employment with SDA should not be terminated.

We wish to advise that a free and confidential counselling service is available for Saputo employees that you may wish to access. The Employee Assistance Program is available to you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and can be contacted on 1300 687 327.

Peter Dyson
IBL Regional Manager – East

Note 19 – employment terminated by Saputo Dairy Australia – related file No. 5

8 November 2021

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

Kris Johnson
Address details

DELIVERED VIA EMAIL

Dear Kris,

SHOW CAUSE

I refer to the first warning issued to you on 25 October 2021 and the second warning issued to you on 1 November 2021.

As has been reiterated to you, your continued failure or refusal to obtain a COVID-19 vaccination or provide us with evidence of your vaccination status in compliance with the COVID-19 Mandatory Vaccination (Workers) Directions (‘the DIrections’) has meant you are unable to meet the inherent requirements of your role.

It is also a requirement of your role that you comply with our COde of Ethics, including the requirement to comply with all applicable laws and regulations.

We consider your ongoing failure or refusal to obtain a COVID-19 vaccination or provide us with evidence of your vaccination status in order to comply with the Directions, after having been directed to do so, to also amount to a failure to follow a lawful and reasonable direction.

In these circumstances it is apparent to us that your ongoing employment with SDA is now untenable.

Accordingly, you are requested to show cause in writing why your employment should not be terminated. If you wish to do so, you must provide any further comments to us in writing by Friday 12th November 2021 for our consideration.

We will then advise you of any consequences for your employment.

Peter Dyson
IBL Regional Manager – East

TEST NOTE ONLY using a different browser – due to ACCESS DENIED MESSAGE

Note 20 – employment terminated by Saputo Dairy Australia – related file No. 6 (Page 1 of 13)

12 November 2021

CONFIDENTIAL

To
Peter Dyson
Regional Manager – Inbound Logistics (East) Saputo Dairy Australia Pty Ltd

Cc
Kate McLaren
Head of Inbound Logistics Saputo Dairy Australia Pty Ltd

Simon Gauci
Head of HR Supply Chain & Workplace Relations Saputo Dairy Australia Pty Ltd

DELIVERED VIA EMAIL

Dear Peter,

FORMAL RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE LETTER DATED 8 NOVEMBER 2021

Per my SHOW CAUSE letter dated (and issued) 8 November 2021, it states:

“In these circumstances it is apparent to us that that your ongoing employment with SDA in now untenable.

Accordingly, you are required to show cause in writing why your employment should not be terminated. If you wish to do so, you must provide any further comments to us in writing by Friday 12th November 2021 for our consideration.”

Please note this letter, and the contents herein constitutes my formal response to your request to “Show cause”.

1.0 Summary of relevant exchanges to date, as of 12 Nov 2021

Tuesday, 12 Oct 2021 – Post familiarising myself with the SDA documentation entitled:

• SDA-Vic-employee-letter-Authorised-Worker-mandatory-vaccination- requirement_7Oct2021_FINAL (issued to all SDA employees on 7 Oct 21); and,
• SDA-Vic-employee-letter-Authorised-Worker-mandatory-vaccination- requirement_7Oct2021_FINAL (issued to all SDA employees on 11 Oct 21)

I wrote to yourself via internal email on the evening of 12 Oct 21 (between approximately 7:00 – 7:30pm) to provide both yourself and Anthony Hanily (Regional Supervisor, IBL East) with forward

Note 20 cont’d – employment terminated by Saputo Dairy Australia – related file No. 6 (Page 2 of 13)

visibility (prior to the COB, 15 Oct deadline) that it was my intention to not proceed with getting the COVID-19 “vaccination” per the SDA directions.

I confirm I received no written reply to this advice from either yourself or Anthony Hanily.

Wednesday, 13 Oct 2021 – At 10am I attended a brief high-level face to face meeting entitled “Vaccination status” with yourself and Kate McLaren (Head of Inbound Logistics, SDA).

During this exchange, it was an opportunity for me to expand in a little more detail as to my personal justification for not wanting to proceed with having the COVID-19 “vaccination”.

During this initial face to face exchange, it was also an opportunity for me to float the idea of continuing to both support and add value to the Inbound Logistics (BL) operations via a Work from Home (WFH) setting as this would allow me to continue to support the operation, whilst also ensuring compliance with the ‘directions’.

I was appreciative of the time given by both yourself and Kate during this initial exchange, and the commitment given to follow up with the SDA Human Resources (HR) team specific to my individual circumstances. I note Kate made mention of having already issued an email to the SDA HR specific to myself being a member of the IBL team that had communicated their unwillingness to receive the COVID-19 “vaccination”.

Wednesday, 13 Oct 2021, cont’d – A brief follow up (unscheduled) session between myself, yourself and Kate later in the day where my key take-away was the requested opportunity to Work from Home would most likely not be taken up. I was disappointed with this feedback as I was not satisfied there was a genuine assessment made with respect to this opportunity.

Note – I also facilitated 2x Toolbox meetings on 13 Oct 2021. Whilst the Toolbox meetings were just getting started again at Maffra transport office after a reported 6-month hiatus, I would typically make reference to any Corporate Communications issued during these sessions. However, I refrained from doing so with respect to the 7 Oct and 11 Oct SDA Mandatory “vaccination” company directions as I was not personally comfortable with the tone of the communications, therefore I refrained from formally tabling or discussing these with the team during the Toolbox meetings of 13 Oct 21.

Thursday, 14 Oct 2021 – A brief follow up session with yourself to “check-in” to confirm if there had been a change in my status, where I advised you that there was no change in status with respect to the “vaccination” requirement. I note as part of this brief 1:1 exchange you remarked how you “admired my conviction to stand by my principles”.

I also noted during this exchange you provided me with awareness of the fact you were actually on secondment in the role of Regional Manager (IBL East) which was originally due to wrap up in Aug 21, however, was extended until Dec 21 in lieu of Matt Walker (former Regional Supervisor – IBL East) exiting SDA. You also advised that the role of Regional Manager (IBL East) would be advertised via Seek once you had an opportunity to brief the broader team with respect to your pending departure to other duties within SDA post completion of your secondment in Dec 21.

Friday, 15 Oct 2021 (3:37pm) – I issued communication (via internal email) to yourself and Anthony Hanily advising that in lieu of not having received additional feedback throughout the day (15 Oct) as was expected per your feedback on 14 Oct 21, I would ensure that I would not attend site as per the SDA directives (issued 7 and 11 Oct) and would continue to support the IBL East operation in a WFH

Note 20 cont’d – employment terminated by Saputo Dairy Australia – related file No. 6

capacity in lieu of not having received direction (at the time of email) that this was not an option to do so.

At approximately 4:00pm, I received a call to my work mobile from yourself where you advised you were following up on my email issued at 3:37pm, and to verbally confirm that there was no change to my status (e.g. being vaccinated or booked in to be vaccinated on or prior to 22 Oct).

I advised you there was no change to my status of either being vaccinated or having a booking to be vaccinated.

In lieu of this feedback you requested (per direction received from Kate McLaren) that I proceed to leave my ‘devices’ locked in my Maffra based office as I would effectively proceed to be on leave without pay as of Monday, 18 Oct 21. I do note however, this feedback and direction was being provided to myself even though you were yet to receive any formal direction and guidance from the SDA HR team.

You then proceeded to summarise ‘next steps’ as you understood them to be as follows:

• I would receive my FIRST WARNING letter on Monday, 18 Oct due to my non-compliance with the mandatory vaccination directives issued by SDA
• Over the course of approximately a one-month period there would be an escalation of warning letters to myself which would potentially culminate into a termination of employment if I maintained my status of non-compliance with the SDA directives

I proceeded to advise you that you had caught me “just in time” as I was literally about to get into my car to drive home for the day.

Per your verbal direction, I proceeded to gather my ‘devices’ (work laptop and mobile) from the back seat of my car and walked them back to my Maffra based office as directed.

*** IMPORTANT *** – I am having a range of ACCESS DENIED issues attempting to add my SHOW CAUSE response to the Notes section of this website.

In summary – on 12 Nov 2021 I submitted a detailed 13-page SHOW CAUSE response to SDA

Note 21 – employment terminated by Saputo Dairy Australia – related file No. 7

22 November 2021

STRICTLY CONFIDENTAIL

Kristin Johnson
Address details

DELIVERED VIA EMAIL

Dear Kris,

CONFIRMATION OF TERMINATION

I refer to the first warning issued to you on 25 October 2021, the second warning issued to you on 1 November 2021, the show cause letter issued to you on 8 November 2021 and the discussion had with your Manager on 21 October 2021.

We have considered all the circumstances, including those which you put to us on 12 November 2021, and the fact it is not operationally feasible for you to perform your role 100% of the time from home.

Ultimately by your own conduct, you continue to make yourself unable to meet the inherent requirements of your role, have consistently failed or refused to follow our lawful and reasonable directions, in circumstances where you knew it would impact your ongoing employment with Saputo Dairy Australia and in doing so, have behaved in a way that is inconsistent with our Code of Ethics.

Accordingly,inthosecircumstances,yourongoingemploymentwithushasbecomeuntenable and you have left us with no alternative but to terminate your employment with effect from 23 November 2021.

At this time you will be paid out notice and any accrued leave entitlements otherwise owing to you.

We would like to remind you that a confidential counselling support is also available to you through Saputo Dairy Australia’s Employee Assistance Program (EAP) by calling 1300 687 327.

Yours sincerely,

Darren Richter
Supply Chain Director

Note 22 – mandatory COVID-19 “vaccine” as a condition of employment with Boom Logistics Ltd.

Related reference – OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT dated 21 December 2021

Vaccine references within OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT

START DATE: 10 January 2021 (pending compliance to Victorian COVID-19 vaccinations mandates)

Clause – VACCINATIONS

1.1 Subject to clause 1.3, this offer of employment is conditional on you demonstrating to the Company that you are fully vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine and provide evidence of vaccination to the Company before commencing employment.

1.2 During your employment the Company may direct you, at its absolute discretion, to receive a vaccination. Such vaccinations include, but are not limited to, vaccinations for COVID-19, seasonal influenza or any other prevailing disease or virus. You agree this is reasonable to protect the health and safety of you, other employees and those you interact with in the course of your duties.

1.3 Clause 1.1 and 1.2 do not apply if you have been issued with a contraindication certificate from a medical practitioner and a copy of that certificate is presented to a nominated Company representative. In this case, the Company will assess whether you are still able to perform the inherent requirements of the role due to you not being able to receive the relevant vaccination.

Note 23 – Victoria Police “surveillance”

On Sunday, 15 August 2021 I observed 2x uniformed Victorian Police Officers park across from my house with 1x of the Officers exiting the vehicle and proceed to take photos of my house. I recall the date as it was the day before I would begin my *new* role with Saputo Dairy Australia on Monday, 16 Aug 2021.

Initially I though very little of the VicPol vehicle parked in the street as it was not uncommon for VicPol to visit the street I live in.

However, it wasn’t until I observed the taking of photographs that I knew that the visit was directed toward myself.

I noted at this stage (Aug 2021) that I had been quite proactive with my direct engagement with many Victorian parliamentarians specific to what I viewed as COVID-19 over-reach (e.g. lockdowns, WFH, masks, etc.), and also quite pro-active on social media with respect to raising awareness of the potential harms to children due to the mandatory mask mandates.

Note 24 – HSP0047C – 12480018 | Workplace Pandemic Health Plan Revision 2 (AGL Loy Yang)

Document authorisation date:

30.04.2018

Document authorisers:

Stephen Rieniets – General Manager, AGL Loy Yang at time of document sign-off
Jeff Hobson – Head of Mining, AGL Loy Yang at time of document sign-off
Len McLachlan – Head of Generation, AGL Loy Yang at time of document sign-off

Responsible Officer – Nick Demetrios, Manager Group Security at time of document sign-off
Document author – Nick Demetrios, Manager Group Security at time of document sign-off

Document from April 2018 made reference to face masks, social distancing, travel restrictions (I believe), vaccines, death and the WHO.

Please note:

At the time of the beginning of COVID-19 and the declaration of a “State of Emergency” a decision was made to not share this document with the Leadership team, of which I was a member.

I personally stumbled across this document as it was referenced during a 3rd party external audit.

Being somewhat dismayed with not having recognised this document I completed a search of my email files only to find a reference to it some years earlier (Version 1 perhaps).

I completed a search of the documents “Check-out” history where it was evident that certain personnel at the site had checked out the document prior to COVID-19 “emergency” which indicated some personnel were “worded up”.

Nick Demetrios was the site based “Go to” for “Operation Magpie – Counter Terrorism training (VicPol / Army)” (Nov 2019) which was executed a few weeks after the table-top scenario planning exercise “Event 201”.

Other key personnel at this site – John Kienhuis (Incident Management Team “Commander”) & Nigel Browne (General Manager, AGL Loy Yang during COVID-19).

The CEO & MD at the time (Apr 2018) was Andy Vesey.

Note 25 – I note that the AGL Loy Yang Workplace Pandemic Health Plan Revision 2 (AGL Loy Yang) with document authorisation date of 30.04.2018 was finalised within a few days of the following Bill Gates article – https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2018/04/27/bill-gates-calls-on-u-s-to-lead-fight-against-a-pandemic-that-could-kill-millions/

Note 26 – National Police Check

In lieu of my lived experiences since the “Emergency” declaration I decided to progress a National Police check to see how it benchmarked against previous applications.

It was noted that my application was observed as having been put through an ‘escalation’ process.

Whilst the result informed me that I was “all clear” as far as convictions and the like, I did note that the additional language used in the final ‘results’ was indicative of someone being under surveillance.

Note 27 – attempt to blackmail

In late Jan / early Feb 2022 I received an email (located in my Junk mail) which I viewed as an to blackmail myself.

I proceeded to report the matter. On 9 Feb 2022 at 9:12pm I received communication from Australian Government – Australian Signals Directorate | Australian Cyber Security Centre. The reference number for my report was: CIRS-20220209-196

On 10 Feb 2022 at 9:01am I received communication via CYBER-MGR@police.vic.gov.au. marked OFFICIAL:Sensitive.

The footer of this email stated –

“EMAIL DISCLAIMER
This email and any attachments are the property of Victoria Police and should not be disclosed. They may also be subject to copyright.
If you are not an intended recipient of this email please immediately contact us by replying to this email and then delete this email. You must not read, use,copy, retain, forward or disclose this email or any attachment.
We do not accept any liability arising from or in connection with unauthorised use or disclosure of the information contained in this email or any attachment.
We make reasonable efforts to protect against computer viruses but we do not accept liability for any liability, loss or damage caused by any computer virus contained in this email.”

So I will refrain from divulging the content of the received correspondence.

It does not add value to speculate as to the source of the original email, however I witnessed the email being deleted from my Junk mail during a time when I was simply confirming if it was still there. I did not make reference to the date or time of this witnessed deletion.

Note 28 – cancellation of ARTG Identifier 339478

ARTG Start Date 14/07/2020
GMDN 35177
GMDN Term Mask, surgical, single use

Manufacturer details:
Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd.

Address:
Weiyuan Industrial Zone
Menggang Changyuan County
Henan, 453400 China

Comment – I made reference to ARTG Identifier 339478 in my correspondence to the VIC CHO and Minister for Education in my mandatory face mask queries. I found it rather odd when the TGA website no longer returned a positive search result for this particular Identifier. So I email the TGA directly to confirm status. The feedback received was that it was Cancelled.

It is unknown (by myself) how many (if any?) of these face masks were actually imported into Australia in support of the face mask requirement?

Note 29 – resignation with AGL Energy

I completed my Workday resignation paperwork in the AM of Thursday, 15 Apr 2021. I delivered my AGL assets (e.g. laptop, uniform, etc.) to site on Friday, 16 Apr 2021. My final day with AGL was Thursday, 13 May 2021.

Related references:

1. 03 Mar 2021 – https://www.peopleforsafevaccines.org/_files/ugd/b46d3b_c9b9fcf0717f4f92a2999d441eca6f70.pdf
2. 15 Apr 2021 – https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/legal-watchdog-cancels-licence-of-lawyer-leading-tower-lockdown-lawsuit-20210415-p57jfo.html

Note 30 – on 15 Nov 2021 I issued the below FOI request

Subject: Request for documents per Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth)

The FOI Co-ordinator,
Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet
PO Box 6500
CANBERRA ACT 2600

email: foi@pmc.gov.au

Dear FOI Coordinator,

This is a request for the purpose of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) for access to the following documents:

The agenda, minutes and records of decisions of all meetings from 13 March 2020 to date of the inter-governmental meeting that the Prime Minister refers to as the “National Cabinet”.

All correspondence and documents concerning COVID-19 in possession of the Department of Prime Minister and cabinet to/from the Australian Health Protection and Principles Committee and its members between 13 March 2020 to date.

All correspondence and documents in possession of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet to/ from the Victorian government that relate to the mandatory vaccination of workers between 13 March 2020 to date.

Should you have any questions relating to this request, please contact me.

Yours sincerely,

Regards,

Kris Johnson

***

I received a reply on 7 Dec 2021 per reference FOI/2021/289.

Subject: FOI/2021/289 – Freedom of Information – Practical Refusal Consultation Notice [SEC=OFFICIAL]

OFFICIAL
FOI/2021/289

Dear Mr Johnson

Please find attached correspondence regarding your request under the Freedom of Information Act 1982.

Yours sincerely

Adviser | FOI Section
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
p. (02) 6271 5849

Note 31 – I received my 1st ‘dose’ of Pfizer Comirnaty in the AM of 22 Dec 2021

Related references:

22 Dec 2021 – WA becomes first state to mandate booster shot as Premier reinstates hard border – https://www.watoday.com.au/national/western-australia/watch-live-premier-mark-mcgowan-to-give-a-covid-19-update-20211222-p59jme.html

22 Dec 2021 – Interview with Chris Smith from 2GB Breakfast on 22 December 2021, on COVID-19 vaccine booster roll out – https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/interview-with-chris-smith-from-2gb-breakfast-on-22-december-2021-on-covid-19-vaccine-booster-roll-out

22 Dec 2021 – Bill Gates on Omicron: ‘We could be entering the worst part of the pandemic’ – https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/22/business/bill-gates-omicron/index.html

Note 32 – “closing the door” on phone screen interview due to ‘Booster’ feedback – on 28 Dec 2022 I issued the below communication to the relevant Saputo Diary Australia representative

Subject: Re: Formal response to SHOW CAUSE letter dated 8 Nov 2021 for Kris Johnson (8019029)

For the attention of:

Simon Gauci – Head of HR Supply Chain & Workplace Relations (Saputo Dairy Australia)

–

Dear Simon,

The purpose of this communication is to provide you with some pertinent feedback specific to a recent exchange with a member of the Talent Acquisition team at Saputo.

In “good faith” I submitted an application for the role of Commercial Transport Manager with Saputo as I believed there were genuine synergies between my established work experience and the role itself.

I was requested by Pratima Prasad to participate in an initial screening call per normal protocols.

The phone screen took place at 10:45am on Thursday, 27 Oct.

Disappointingly, I was informed (by Pratima) that she was going to have to “close the door” on my phone screen interview. Not because she identified any skills or knowledge gaps with respect to my suitability for the role, but because I advised I would not be proceeding to have a ‘booster’ shot for the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’. Pratima advised Saputo (as at 27 Oct 22) still had a mandatory ‘booster’ shot policy in place. Pratima also advised (during the verbal exchange) that she may loop back to myself in the event that Saputo were to drop the mandatory ‘booster’ requirement. It is also important to note that Saputo failed to provide applicants with awareness that a ‘booster’ shot for COVID-19 would be a requirement. If it had, then I would not have proceeded with my application.

Naturally, it was extremely disappointing to have my phone screen “cut off” as a result of my personal medical decisions (again) as opposed to not being suitable for the role (skills and established work experience).

It was even more disappointing to receive the below WorkDay email advisory notice from Saputo on 28 Oct 22 at 3:37pm advising “We carefully reviewed your application and we will not be considering it further for this position at this time.” This advisory notice fails to stipulate the actual reason (unwillingness to have a ‘booster’ shot) why my application was assessed as being no longer under consideration.

Image 1 – SMS exchange (Kris & Pratima) and WorkDay advice pertaining to the application for Commercial Transport Manager role

Thanks for your time.

Regards,

Kris Johnson
johnsonkpg@outlook.com

***

I received feedback to my correspondence on 19 Jan 2023.

Note 33 – related reference – CHART I.-COMMUNIST COERCIVE METHODS FOR ELICITING INDIVIDUAL COMPLIANCE (Page 4 of 10)

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1806204/pdf/bullnyacadmed00378-0046.pdf

Note 34 – as at 17 Mar 2023, the Victorian Health & Safety regulator (Worksafe Victoria) is STILL advising prospective employees of a mandatory 3x ‘vaccines’ requirement as a condition of employment. Refer below role vacancy extract below.

Source: https://www.seek.com.au/job/66218883?type=standout#sol=fde1a41050c150c337e7aea9132a714fa27d264a

“Our Future

WorkSafe’s Strategy has our core purpose front of mind – reducing workplace harm and improving outcomes for injured workers. We don’t shy away from the importance of our purpose to the Victorian community, that’s why we have a stated ambition to be world leading.

We want Victoria to be the safest place to work in Australia and one of the safest in the world; and we aspire to be a world leader in return to work after a workplace injury.

Important Information

WorkSafe is committed to providing and maintaining a working environment which is safe and without risk to the health of its employees consistent with WorkSafe’s obligations under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (OH&S Act).

Therefore, all WorkSafe employees are required to have an up to date COVID-19 vaccination status, which is currently defined by the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) as three vaccine doses, unless a valid medical exemption applies.

To meet our obligations under the OH&S Act, WorkSafe will request vaccination information or evidence of an exemption in the pre-employment stage.

Prior to commencement of employment with WorkSafe you will need to provide evidence that you are vaccinated against COVID-19 and have an up to date vaccination status, or that a medical exemption applies.”

Note 35 – as at 17 Mar 2023, Victoria Police are STILL requiring a 3x ‘vaccines’ as a condition of employment in accordance with their organisational policy.

Source: https://www.seek.com.au/job/65678750?type=standout#sol=841345c993a2c673599cccf4c3ccb1795193106e

“In accordance with organisational policy, all Victoria Police employees are required to be fully vaccinated (including a booster vaccination) against COVID-19 or hold a valid medical exception. As such your employment with Victoria Police is subject to providing evidence of your vaccination status.”

Note 36 – on 11 Apr 2022, I was awarded with a Commendation from the Maritime Commander Australia, with the following citation:

LEADING SEAMAN ELECTRONIC TECHNICIAN
KRISTIN PATRICK JOHNSON 8098084

The Maritime Commander Australia commends Leading Seaman Electronic Technician Kristin Patrick Johnson for his outstanding dedication and devotion to duty as a member of the Guided Missile Launching System maintenance team and for his overall contribution to whole ship activities, particularly as a member of HMAS NEWCASTLE’s Boarding Party.

During both the Operational Level of Capability work-up and Operational Readiness Evaluation Leading Seaman Johnson consistently displayed his excellent ability to adapt to an ever changing environment. He displayed maturity and resolve in often trying conditions, endeavouring to produce innovative solutions to ensure a high quality of service and system availability.

As a member of the ship’s Boarding Party, Leading Seaman Johnson has consistently displayed superior leadership and has been a steadying influence on the junior members of the team. His efforts within the Boarding Party earned him special mention by Commodore Flotillas and were an important ingredient in the Boarding Team achieving and maintaining the Operational Level of Capability standard.

The outstanding professionalism, commitment and dedication demonstrated by Leading Seaman Johnson are deserving of the highest praise and are in the finest traditions of the Royal Australian Navy.

G.F. SMITH
Rear Admiral RAN
Maritime Commander Australia

Note 37 – related reference – “Milgram’s Experiment on Obedience to Authority”

Source: https://nature.berkeley.edu/ucce50/ag-labor/7article/article35.htm

Note 38 – in lieu of the copious amounts of information pertaining to the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ being neither ‘Safe’ nor ‘Effective’ I issued the below follow up query to my former employer Boom Logistics Ltd. on 28 Dec 2022.

***

For the attention of:

Michael Spedding – East Coast GM, Boom Logistics

–

Dear Michael,

The purpose of this communication is to seek your confirmation and feedback specific to the medical, scientific and legal justifications and associated references for making the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ a mandatory condition specific to my OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT with Boom Logistics Ltd.?

I also note that during our verbal exchange on 17 Dec 21 (post Zoom interview with Ben and Andrew) you made reference to you being a member of the Australian Army Reserve?

It would be appreciated if this information (medical, scientific and legal justifications and associated references) could be supplied by COB 06.01.2023.

Comment – my email was accompanied with an attached copy of my Letter of Offer and 2x screen shots of the ‘vaccine’ related clauses directions comprised within my Letter of Offer

Regards,

Kris Johnson
johnsonkpg@outlook.com

***

Note – I received a reply to my correspondence from Andrew Brooks (National Human Resources & Industrial Relations Manager) at Boom Logistics Ltd. on 6 Jan 2023.

Note 39 – related reference – ACTU boss responds to calls for mandatory vaccination in the workplace (18 Aug 2021)

Source: https://www.3aw.com.au/actu-boss-responds-to-calls-for-mandatory-vaccination-in-the-workplace/

Note 40 – a vast network of whispering little birds

Since tendering my resignation (constructive dismissal) from AGL Energy in Apr 2021, I have issued in excess of six-hundred (600) job applications in support of securing ongoing employment.

The primary objective for myself has been to simply secure employment with a role that is a good fit for my established work experience and established skill set.

However, as a result of this lived experience I DO NOT hesitate to say I have most definitely noticed a disturbing pattern of behaviour from both human resource personnel and 3rd party recruitment agencies. This observed behaviour would be tantamount to HR departments and 3rd party recruitment firms playing a ‘gate-keeper’ role in support of the “Great Reset” agenda.

Note 41 – related reference – Fair Work backs Victoria’s firefighters union in dragged-out pay dispute with CFA (1 Jun 2016)

Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-01/fair-work-backs-firefighters-union-in-pay-dispute/7468682

Note 42 – related reference – Appointment of new Chair of Safe Work Australia (9 Feb 2016)

Source: https://ministers.dese.gov.au/cash/appointment-new-chair-safe-work-australia

Note 43 – related reference – Government Nominates Rod Sims as ACCC Chairman (3 May 2011)

Source: https://ministers.treasury.gov.au/ministers/wayne-swan-2007/media-releases/government-nominates-rod-sims-accc-chairman

Note 44 – related reference – Media Release: New President leads Fair Work Australia (24 Feb 2012)

Source: https://www.billshorten.com.au/media-release-new-president-leads-fair-work-australia

Note 45 – related reference – WorkSafe Chief Executive And Board Members Appointed (29 Oct 2019)

Source: https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/site-4/worksafe-chief-executive-and-board-members-appointed-0

Note 46 – related reference – Appointments to the Reserve Bank Board (5 May 2016)

Source: https://www.rba.gov.au/media-releases/2016/mr-16-11.html

Note 47 – related reference – Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI)

Source: https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/

Note 48 – related reference – Dr. Sam Bailey, The Origins of COVID-19 (18 Mar 2023)

Source: https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/covid-19/the-origins-of-covid-19/

Note 49 – sample of abnormal recruiting practices

Company: Jet Aviation
Advertised role: Logistics, Supply & GSE Supervisor (was previously advertised as Coordinator)
Role location: RAAF base, East Sale (VIC)
Job ad: https://www.seek.com.au/job/61361361?type=standout#sol=a9e8e740b0d72029ec25b7585d6eca7fa37c5f00

Since Jun 2021, this particular role has been advertised and re-advertised at least 6-8 times in a 20-22 month period.

I personally had an email exchanged with a company (Jet Aviation) representative with respect to this position in early Dec 2021 in response to my 24 Nov 2021 application. At the time my application was not progressed due to my then ‘vaccination’ status.

With this latest job ad, they have simply exchanged the word “Coordinator” with “Supervisor”, however it is the same role.

I have noticed this pattern of behaviour across many and varied employers since Apr 2021, however 6-8 times for a single role within 20-22 months is the record as far as my own observations go.

Either:

– Jet Aviation has failed to ‘find’ the ‘perfect’ candidate for this role
– All successful candidates have resigned within a month or two of their successful appointment
– the role simply doesn’t exist?

I also note that this latest job ad (21 Feb 2023) is still requesting applicants confirm their COVID-19 vaccination status as part of the application process.

Note 50 – termination of employment with Saputo Dairy Australia (SDA)

My employment with SDA was terminated due to my ongoing non-compliance with ‘vaccine’ mandates effective COB, Tuesday 23 Nov 2021

Related reference: 24 Nov 2021 – Doctor who posted controversial Covid videos loses fight to stop Medical Council investigation – https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/doctor-who-posted-controversial-covid-videos-loses-fight-to-stop-medical-council-investigation/DWGDMQRV4J4N7OPQMOLADVRMQM/

Note 51 – related reference – The Ballistics Report Is In: Pfizer Lot# FL8095 Murdered 2 and Injured 1262 Children.

Source: https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/the-ballistics-report-is-in-pfizer?r=1x92wp&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Note 52 – related reference – “Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work” by Paul Babiak PhD. with Robert D. Hare PhD.

Source: https://www.harpercollins.com.au/9780062697547/snakes-in-suits-revised-edition/

Note 53 – Dr John Skerrit appointed as new head of TGA (3 May 2012)

Source: https://vivacommunications.com.au/blog/dr-john-skerrit-appointed-as-new-head-of-tga/

Note 54 – Event 201 Players – Jane Halton

Source: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/exercises/event201/players/halton.html

Note 55 – related reference – National Cabinet Unlocked: AAT issues Freedom of Information ruling (1 Oct 2021)

Source: https://www.holdingredlich.com/national-cabinet-unlocked-aat-issues-freedom-of-information-ruling

Note 56 – related reference – Perverting the Course of Justice (VIC)

Source: http://melbourne.australiancriminallawyers.com.au/offences/perverting-the-course-of-justice

Note 57 – related references – AGL | ACCC

Source 1 – ACCC Maintains Opposition to AGL Acquiring Stake in Loy Yang Power (8 Sep 2003) – https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-maintains-opposition-to-agl-acquiring-stake-in-loy-yang-power

Source 2 – ACCC not to oppose AGL’s acquisition of Loy Yang Power (24 May 2012) – https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-not-to-oppose-agls-acquisition-of-loy-yang-power

Note 58 – related reference – Dr Brett Sutton appointed Victoria’s Chief Health Officer (21 Mar 2019)

Source: https://www.health.vic.gov.au/media-releases/dr-brett-sutton-appointed-victorias-chief-health-officer

Note 59 – related reference – Victoria’s COVID-19 response commander Jeroen Weimar is stepping down (21 Apr 2022)

Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-04-21/jeroen-weimar-to-leave-covid-response-role/101005448

Note 60 – FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world (214 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever

Source: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

Note 61 – Institutions listing (214 as at 10 Apr)

Source: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Institution-list-for-website.xls

Note 62 – Brain injuries after COVID vaccination, Colleen Huber NMD (10 Apr 2023)

Source: https://open.substack.com/pub/colleenhuber/p/brain-injuries-after-covid-vaccination?r=1x92wp&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Note 63 – A Farewell To Virology (Expert Edition) – Dr Mark Bailey (16 Sep 2022)

Source: https://drsambailey.substack.com/p/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition

Note 64 – The “Settling The Virus Debate” Statement (14 Jul 2022)

Source: https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate/

Note 65 – THE COVID-19 FRAUD & WAR ON HUMANITY (11 Nov 2021)

Source: https://drsambailey.com/the-covid-19-fraud-war-on-humanity/

Note 66 – related reference – Everybody Knows by William Russell Massingham Pridgeon (April 2023)

Source: https://www.amazon.com.au/Everybody-William-Russell-Massingham-Pridgeon/dp/B0C1JB1WPZ

Note 67 – related reference material – located at URL https://www.jesusislord.melbourne/ (Brian Shaw)

Note 68 – the Victorian State budget (2023_2024)

The 2023_2024 Victorian State budget should be viewed as tangible material evidence as it demonstrates the desired “end result” with respect to deliberate and wilful miss-use of publicly funded “COVID” measures to keep everyone safe from a non-existent “virus”.

Direct source: https://www.dtf.vic.gov.au/state-budget

Related reference: https://haveyenotread.com/the-old-devils-are-at-it-again-covid-and-the-greatest-wealth-theft-in-world-history/

Note 69 – creating of the “Shadow Boxer Diaries” Substack and Facebook page

On 19 Dec 2022 I created both a Substack account and Facebook page entitled the “Shadow Boxer Diaries”.

It was clearly evident during late Nov 22 and the first half of Dec 22 that there was a ramp up of more fear in the run up to the Christmas holiday period. Truth be told, I created the “Shadow Boxer Diaries” Substack and Facebook page to act as an electronic deterrent to counter to pending attempt to subject Australians to further ritualistic abuse (masking, etc.) during the pending holiday season.

Related articles:

1. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-23/china-estimates-covid-surge-is-infecting-37-million-people-a-day
2. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/china-estimates-covid-surge-is-infecting-37-million-people-day-bloomberg-news-2022-12-23/
3. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2022/12/30/asia-pacific/china-covid-guessing-game/
4. https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/2022/12/31/china-covid-virus-evolution/
5. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/dec/28/chinas-move-to-open-up-travel-sparks-concern-over-spread-of-new-covid-variants
6. https://www.businesstoday.in/coronavirus/story/china-covid-crisis-china-getting-37-million-cases-in-a-day-says-report-357584-2022-12-23
7. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/12/23/china-could-be-experiencing-37-million-daily-covid-19-infections
8. https://www.who.int/news/item/30-12-2022-who-meets-with-chinese-officials-on-current-covid-19-situation
9. https://english.alarabiya.net/coronavirus/2022/12/23/China-estimates-COVID-19-surge-is-infecting-37-million-people-a-day

There is ample material evidence confirming the 30M+ cases per day in late Dec 22 was BULLSHIT!!!

Note 70 – AMBUSHED termination of my employment with Boom Logistics Ltd.

On 7 April 2022 I was effectively AMBUSHED by my 1-up leader (GM, East Coast) who proceeded to verbally terminate my employment with IMMEDIATE effect. The justification given for my termination was that I was not where I needed to be in order to oversee high-rsk crane operations in heavy industry. Whilst I concur I had some work to do to get myself up to speed, it does not justify being AMBUSHED and having ones Manager effectively stand over them whilst they give you five minutes to hand pack your business related assets and be driven home by one of your current direct reports.

Personally, I believe the reason for my AMBUSHED termination ties directly back to a failed attempt to frame myself for being a breach of the OHS Act 2044 (Vic). Organisations involved in this attempted framing were:

– WorkSafe VIC
– Boom Logisitics Ltd.
– CFMMEU (Construction arm)
– EnergyAustralia (site where incident occured)
– Ventia (maintenance contractor)
– 3rd party law firm (engaged to defend Boom Logistics during pending litigation)

In support of defending myself, I documented everything that transpired from my perspective and submitted for Boom Management review. My feedback was subject to Legal Privilege. It is my personal belief that the feedback I provided summarised the attempted framing, hence my AMBUSHED termination well prior to the nominated response date stipulated on the Provisional Improvement Notice (PIN) personally issued to myself for response.

RECAP – in the first few months of 2022 I was subjected to both a Blackmail attempt and what I genuinely believed to an attempt to frame myself for being in breach of the OHS Act 2004 (Vic).

Note 71 – Dr Mike Yeadon – Truth Be Told London | 13.05.2023 | Oracle Films

Source: https://rumble.com/v2o9kvu-dr-mike-yeadon-truth-be-told-london-13.05.2023-oracle-films.html

Note 72 – Occult Ritual Transformation and Coronavirus: How Mask Wearing, Hand Washing, “Social Separation” and Lockdowns Are Age-Old Occult Rituals Being Used to Initiate People Into a New Global Order

by Steve Barwick (19 May 2020)

Source: https://haveyenotread.com/occult-ritual-transformation-and-coronavirus/

Note 73 – The Characteristics of an Initiation Ritual (Run time: 12.36)

Source: https://youtu.be/3RVG8qNLdoY

Note 74 – Forrest secures Chinese virus supplies (April 1 2020)

Source: https://www.thesenior.com.au/story/6707521/forrest-secures-chinese-virus-supplies/

Note 75 – Sunrise’s Kochie fumes at Josh Frydenberg over lack of mandatory vaccine policy (10 Aug 2021)

Source: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/sunrises-kochie-fumes-at-josh-frydenberg-over-lack-of-mandatory-vaccine-policy/news-story/c6be398a03154697486b7dfc09e32843

Note 76 – Brian Shaw The United Nations Trap – 13 Aug 2009 (Run time: 2 hrs 37 mins)

Source: https://youtu.be/WTGwEBRw_fk

Note 77 – the lengthy and drawn out CFA vs UFU dispute

The lengthy and drawn out CFA vs UFU dispute should be viewed through the lens of a Victorian Premier being of forward knowledge that an army of ‘authorised officers’ would be required for a pending ‘pandemic’.

It is important to also acknowledge that the original drafts of the Victorian Premier’s ‘pandemic’ legislation drafted under the cover of darkness (with support of a few chosen agreeable cross-benchers) were heavily watered down, hence his intent to mobilise his army of ‘authorised officers’ was thwarted due to intense public pressure and the amendments made to the original draft legislation.

Related references:

1. Victorian Emergency Services Minister Jane Garrett resigns over CFA dispute (10 Jun 2016) – https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/vic-emergency-services-minister-jane-garrett-resigns-over-cfa-dispute-20160610-gpg2s2
2. Jane Garrett’s battle with the UFU (31 Aug 2016) – https://www.9news.com.au/national/jane-garrett-s-battle-with-the-ufu/2fea587a-c061-4644-8026-7aed8baa673d
3. The spectacular fall of Jane Garrett, Daniel Andrews’ main rival (1 Sep 2016) – https://www.crikey.com.au/2016/09/01/jane-garrett-daniel-andrews-main-rival-falls-from-grace-in-cfa-ufu-dispute/
4. Jane Garrett vs the UFU: Political power play the real story behind firefighters’ gender war (11 Mar 2016) – https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/jane-garrett-vs-the-ufu-political-power-play-the-real-story-behind-firefighters-gender-war-20160310-gnfrug.html
5. An open letter to the union movement of Victoria (19 Nov 2018) – https://medium.com/@ebatruth/an-open-letter-to-the-union-movement-of-victoria-6faec8b59c96
6. UFU member launches court action to challenge Jane Garrett’s Labor preselection (5 Oct 2018) – https://thewest.com.au/news/ufu-member-launches-court-action-to-challenge-jane-garretts-labor-preselection-ng-811cff35a7ea1d093089269a699a489e
7. CFA dispute: Former minister Jane Garrett to lodge complaint over ‘distressing’ conduct by UFU boss (30 Aug 2016) – https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-30/jane-garrett-to-lodge-complaint-over-peter-marshalls-conduct/7799012
8. Trades Hall condemns firefighters’ union over ‘bullying’ of Victorian Labor MP Jane Garrett (16 Nov 2018) – https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-11-16/firefighters-union-condemned-trades-hall-attacks-jane-garrett/10504190

Note 78 – HULK SMASH!

On 11 Feb 2021, I posted the below to the “Daniel Andrews Resignation” Facebook Private group.

“In a recent interview, the Incredible HULK was asked what he thought about Parliamentary Paedophile Suppression Orders…
…his response was succinct and straight to the point as he uttered two very simple words:

HULK Smash!”

Related reference: Victoria is heading back into coronavirus lockdown tonight. These are the rules By Freya Michie Posted Fri 12 Feb 2021 at 3:52amFriday 12 Feb 2021 at 3:52am, updated Fri 12 Feb 2021 at 1:35pm – https://amp.abc.net.au/article/13149252

In lieu of the fact that the medical and scientific justification for the February 2021 LOCKDOWN has NEVER been forthcoming, I have genuine reason to suspect that my Facebook post was the catalyst for the “fake” emergency supported by a “fake” lockdown requirement. It was great to see the crew at the ABC doing their bit by drafting and issuing rubbish news articles at 3:52am in the morning… now that’s dedication for you…

Note 79 – Definition of terrorism in Australian law

Terrorism in Commonwealth law is defined as an act or threat that is intended to:

– advance a political, ideological or religious cause; and
– coerce or intimidate an Australian or foreign government or the public (or section of the public ), including foreign public.

The conduct falls within the definition if it:

– causes serious physical harm to a person or serious damage to property;
– causes death or endangers a persons life;
– creates a serious risk to the health and safety to the public (or section of the public), or
– seriously interferes, disrupts or destroys:
— an electronic information, telecommunications or financial system; or
— an electronic system used for the delivery of essential government services, used for or by an essential public utility, or transport system.

Source: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Completed_Inquiries/pjcis/securityleg/report/chapter5#:~:text=and%20refugee%20law.-,Definition%20of%20terrorism%20in%20Australian%20law,public%20)%2C%20including%20foreign%20public

Note 80 – the NET ZERO & COVID-19 connection

The established blue-print and framework for achieving “NET ZERO” should be viewed as material evidence in support of establishing the COVID-19 PLANdemic as a pre-planned and premeditated depopulation event in support of achieving the stated “NET ZERO” goals.

Note 81 – Inside The Vatican’s Surprising Alliance With Biotech Venture Capital by Maureen Mullarkey (15 Jul 2021)

“The pressure for universal injection with a biological agent still under probation is unprecedented. Equally remarkable is the papal embrace of vaccine politics and its network of commercial partners and global governments. Propelled by COVID, the military-industrial complex of 60 years ago has its parallel in the medical-industrial complex. And the Vatican approves.”

Source: https://thefederalist.com/2021/07/15/inside-the-vaticans-surprising-alliance-with-biotech-venture-capital/

Note 82 – lost income calculation between 16 Mar 2020 and 31 May 2023

Utilising a nominal $70 hourly rate, I have estimated a lost income calculation of $151,760.00 AUD covering all Mon-Fri weeks that I have been unemployed between 16 Mar 202 and 31 May 2023

Note 83 – The curtain is closing on virology (5 Jun 2023)

Source: https://open.substack.com/pub/christinemasseyfois/p/the-curtain-is-closing-on-virology

Note 84 – The end of COVID

Sources:

i. https://www.howtube.com/14411
ii. https://theendofcovid.com/

Note 85 – Brett Sutton resigns as Victorian Chief Health Officer

Related references:

1. https://www.9news.com.au/national/victoria-chief-health-officer-brett-sutton-resigns/0c35badf-d866-458a-93ba-91030fa327c2
2. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-09/brett-sutton-resigns-chief-health-officer-csiro/102459626
3. https://www.bendigoadvertiser.com.au/story/8227681/victorias-chief-health-officer-brett-sutton-resigns/?src=rss
4. https://www.smh.com.au/national/victoria/brett-sutton-to-resign-as-victoria-s-chief-health-officer-20230609-p5df9p.html
5. https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/politics/victoria-health-chief-brett-sutton-resigns-after-leading-state-covid-response/news-story/8df69bbad5976cfe895fd9a2b0a9221c
6. https://thewest.com.au/news/health/victorias-chief-health-officer-brett-sutton-resigns-c-10922713
7. https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/health/victorias-chief-health-officer-brett-sutton-resigns-c-10922715
8. https://www.miragenews.com/victorias-chief-health-officer-brett-sutton-1023587/
9. https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/victorias-cho-brett-sutton-resigns-20230609-p5df9t.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed
10. https://www.illawarramercury.com.au/story/8227681/victorias-chief-health-officer-brett-sutton-resigns/
11. https://www.9news.com.au/videos/national/victorias-cho-brett-sutton-resigns/clinnn965000g0jmrrr5a4zhw
12. https://www.3aw.com.au/chief-health-officer-brett-sutton-resigns/
13. https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/brett-sutton-resigns-as-chief-health-officer/news-story/7180339ccf420b86b457ae98d5891955

Note 86 – Acting on climate change and health in Victoria

Brett Sutton, Vanora Mulvenna, Daniel Voronoff and Tiernan Humphrys
Med J Aust 2020; 212 (8): 345-346.e1. || doi: 10.5694/mja2.50527
Published online: 4 May 2020

Source: https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2020/212/8/acting-climate-change-and-health-victoria

Comment – the “NET ZERO” and “COVID-19” connection

Note 87 – LARRY FINK’S 2022 LETTER TO CEOS: The Power of Capitalism

Source: https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/investor-relations/larry-fink-ceo-letter

Note 88 – OFFICIAL EVIDENCE THAT VIROLOGY IS PSEUDOSCIENCE – CHRISTINE MASSEY JUNE 10 2023

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/gvu4NbieSuVb/ (Run time: 40:35)

Note 89 – targeting my children in the lead up to expanding “mandatory” vaccines in Victoria.

In the lead up to expanding the “mandatory” vaccine requirements in Victoria, my daughter (18 at the time) was caught up in both Tier 2 (lead up) and Tier 1 (during) exposure sites at both her places of employment. This was done in an attempt to coercively control my own behaviour in lieu of me having been identified as non-compliant with ALL aspects of CONJAB-19.

I was working for Saputo Dairy Australia at the time.

1x exposure took place prior to the 1 October 2021 “VACCINATION REQUIRED TO PROTECT WORKERS AND VICTORIA” and 1x exposure took place on the same day (15 Oct ’23) that I informed my line management at Saputo Dairy Australia that I would not be complying with the “vaccine” mandate.

Source: https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-10/211001%20-%20Vaccination%20Required%20To%20Protect%20Workers%20And%20Victoria.pdf

Note 90 – Malcolm Turnbull was extremely disappointed with the unsatisfactory “vaccine” rollout

References:

1. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-07-01/malcolm-turnbull-criticises-australian-covid-19-vaccine-rollout/100260940
2. https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-australia-57980530
3. https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-wellbeing/malcolm-turnbull-savages-coronavirus-vaccine-rollout-failure-c-3283992
4. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/australias-vaccine-rollout-a-colossal-failure-ex-pm-turnbull-says-2021-07-27/
5. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/a-phenomenal-failure-malcolm-turnbull-blasts-morrison-governments-covid-19-vaccine-rollout/itcx0nylk
6. https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/turnbull-calls-morrisons-vaccine-rollout-an-incredible-failure/news-story/ecbce506323687d6ffd39a04c5a28b0f
7. https://english.alarabiya.net/coronavirus/2021/07/27/Ex-PM-Turnbull-deems-Australia-s-vaccine-rollout-a-colossal-failure-
8. https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/australias-vaccine-rollout-colossal-failure-065801649.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAJpBUlXMGgHBnpyfVDpr8JfZ2n9po_nazuc6_vJ8zjCx1L3aeLOuzf49nM9-42596ayQR_CIZZSuTwe8CTO7vbvxsLv54GeCiA7aJd3wVfLTnARb1EO6pPq78cSAtKfcne1qtIy5xFZGKQDyjzShQs2AwnzOR4KQK_dp-uw1VvAt

Note 91 – His Excellency General the Honourable David Hurley AC DSC (Retd) Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia

“His Excellency General the Honourable David John Hurley AC DSC (Retd) was sworn in as the Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia on 1 July 2019.”

Source: https://www.gg.gov.au/about-governor-general/governor-generals-biography

Note 92 – Australia PM Tony Abbott talks tough on vaccination (12 April 2015)

“The Australian government has announced that it intends to stop welfare payments to parents who refuse to vaccinate their children.

The “no jab, no pay” policy may cost parents more than A$11,000 a year per child in lost benefit payments.

Prime Minister Tony Abbott said that there would only be a small number of religious and medical exceptions to the new rules – supported by the Labor opposition and due to come into effect in early 2016.”

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-australia-32273992

Note 93 – Legendary Australian Prime Minister John Howard says bosses SHOULD be able to ban staff from the workplace if they refuse to get a Covid-19 jab (3 March 2021)

“John Howard says employers should have the power to ban staff from the workplace if they refuse to get a Covid-19 vaccination.

Australia’s second longest Prime Minister, now 81, said freedom of choice should extend to both workers and bosses.

‘People are free, if they choose not to be vaccinated, but equally an employer in my opinion is free to say, “Well, I want all of my workforce vaccinated”,’ he told Sky News presenter Alan Jones.”

Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9318705/John-Howard-tells-Alan-Jones-bosses-able-ban-staff-refuse-Covid-19-vaccination.html

Note 94 – Labor’s Plan to Beat COVID-19

“We need a plan to beat Covid-19. But more than 18 months into this pandemic, we’re still experiencing outbreaks and lockdowns because the Morrison Government has failed Australia on vaccines and on quarantine. We’ve seen 27 outbreaks from hotel quarantine, and the vaccine rollout has been bungled from the very beginning. Scott Morrison says it’s not a race, but he’s wrong. Millions of Australians suffering lockdowns know it’s a race. Mr Morrison doesn’t have a plan to beat COVID-19 – but we do.”

Source: https://anthonyalbanese.com.au/labors-covid-plan

Note 95 – Op COVID SHIELD National COVID Vaccine Campaign Plan

“Description:

This document presents the National COVID-19 Vaccine Campaign Plan (the Plan) as part of Operation COVID Shield, announced by Prime Minister Scott Morrison on 8 June 2021. Implementation of the Plan will be coordinated by the National COVID Vaccine Taskforce (NCVTF) and led by Lieutenant General (LTGEN) John Frewen as the Coordinator General. The NCVTF’s goals are to ensure public confidence in the vaccine rollout and to ensure that as many Australians as possible are vaccinated as early as possible. The Plan proposes a National cooperative approach which builds on both Australia’s COVID-19 Vaccine and Treatment Strategy, and Australia’s COVID-19 Vaccine National Rollout Strategy to ensure Australia’s vaccination goals are achieved. The Plan anticipates a levelling of uptake toward the end of the year as most willing people will have already been vaccinated. The Plan accounts for foreseen program risks and presents options to mitigate them including modelling of multiple scenarios, with a view to contingency planning and improving preparation for potential challenges such as low workforce capacity in certain states and territories, and reduced or new vaccine supply. The Plan also accounts for the need to continually assess the performance of the rollout and respond to changing circumstances, including the dynamic reallocation of supply, personal protective equipment (PPE), and consumables.”

Source: https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/op-covid-shield-national-covid-vaccine-campaign-plan

Note 96 – “Operation Magpie” (2 Nov 2019)

Operation Magpie was a joint exercise executed by the Victorian Police and the Australian Army.

It was executed a few weeks after table-top exercise “Event 201” in mid October 2019. The exercise was ‘hosted’ by AGL Loy Yang (AGL Energy Ltd.) who had Version 2 of their Workplace Pandemic Health Plan finalised on 30 Apr 2018, so I couldn’t think of anyone better to ‘host’ such an event.

Source: https://www.facebook.com/victoriapolice/videos/519340098918435/?extid=NS-UNK-UNK-UNK-IOS_GK0T-GK1C

Note 97 – Northern Territory scraps vaccine mandate for workers, Chief Minister Natasha Fyles confirms

By Lauren Roberts and Samantha Dick
Posted Thu 9 Jun 2022 at 10:20amThursday 9 Jun 2022 at 10:20am, updated Thu 9 Jun 2022 at 1:11pm

“The Northern Territory will scrap its strict vaccine mandate for workers later this month, Chief Minister Natasha Fyles has confirmed.

Prior to today’s announcement, people in the Northern Territory who worked in a wide range of industries — including teachers, hospitality workers and beauticians — needed all three COVID-19 vaccines to do their jobs.

“We are moving into a world where we are living with COVID,” Ms Fyles said.

“We will end the public health emergency; the vaccine mandate will also end.

“From June 16, we will transition from a state of public health emergency to living with COVID as it becomes endemic in the community.”

Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-09/northern-territory-covid-natasha-fyles/101137616

Note 98 – Sacked Cabinet minister Darren Chester apologises for vaccine rollout after PM refuses to

ABC Gippsland
By Rio Davis
Posted Thu 22 Jul 2021 at 1:11pmThursday 22 Jul 2021 at 1:11pm, updated Thu 22 Jul 2021 at 2:47pm

“The Nationals Member for Gippsland says he is sorry for the federal government’s handling of the vaccine rollout amid anger over the Prime Minister’s unwillingness to apologise for the difficulties people face in getting immunised.”

Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-07-22/sacked-cabinet-minister-apologies-for-vaccine-rollout/100314312

Note 99 – CHESTER ENCOURAGES PEOPLE TO GET VACCINATED (Aug 2, 2021)

“Federal Member for Gippsland Darren Chester is urging eligible Gippslanders to get vaccinated against COVID-19.

Mr Chester, who received his second dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine recently, said that high vaccination numbers would help bolster the fight against Coronavirus.

“I believe the coronavirus vaccination program is an important pathway to returning to a more normal life after the pandemic. It will help to save lives, and livelihoods,” Mr Chester said.

“The last 18 months have been very difficult for many with businesses closed for long periods of time, isolating away from loved ones and many special occasions passing with no celebration due to restrictions.

“I encourage those Gippslanders who are eligible to go and get vaccinated as soon as possible, it is one simple thing we can do to protect ourselves and our loved ones from the virus.

“For those with concerns, speak with your local GP, they will have the knowledge to help alleviate concerns and answer any questions you may have.”

Mr Chester thanked the healthcare workers, including those administering the vaccines, for all they have done throughout the pandemic.

“Our healthcare workers have continued to support and look after the community throughout the pandemic and it is important we acknowledge their contribution,” Mr Chester said.

“Thank you to all those who are working tirelessly to keep our community safe and help with the vaccination rollout.””

Source: https://darrenchester.com.au/chester-encourages-people-to-get-vaccinated/

Note 100 – Appointment of Australian Federal Police Commissioner (24 July 2019)

The Government will recommend to the Governor-General that Mr Reece Kershaw APM be appointed as the 8th Australian Federal Police Commissioner.

Commissioner Kershaw commenced with the Northern Territory Police Force (NTPF) in February 2011 and in April 2015 was appointed Commissioner of Police and Chief Executive Officer of the Northern Territory Police, Fire and Emergency Services.

Prior to commencing with the NTPF Commissioner Kershaw was with the Australian Federal Police, including secondments to the National Crime Authority, the Australian Crime Commission and overseas postings to The Hague, East Timor and the Solomon Islands.

He is a Graduate of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Law Enforcement Executive Development Program and was awarded the Australian Police Medal in the 2016 Australian Day Honours.

We congratulate Commissioner Kershaw on his appointment at a time when the AFP needs to be future ready to meet the challenges posed by those that would seek to do us harm, here and abroad.

The Government again sincerely thanks Commissioner Colvin for the service that he has provided to the Australian community for the last 30 years as a member of the AFP.

Commissioner Colvin enjoyed an extensive AFP career that covered roles in serious and organised crime, counter terrorism, chief of staff and high tech crime. In 2002 Andrew was awarded the Order of Australia Medal for his investigative work into the 2002 Bali bombings. We wish Andrew every success in his future endeavours.”

Source: https://minister.homeaffairs.gov.au/peterdutton/Pages/Appointment-of-Australian-Federal-Police-Commissioner.aspx

Comment – there certainly were a great deal of ‘strategic’ appointments in the year 2019, in the months leading up to “Event 201”.

Note 101 – Victoria’s Next Police Chief Commissioner Appointed

“01 June 2020

The Victorian Government today announced the selection of a new Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police, with current Deputy Commissioner Shane Patton to step into the top job on 27 June.

Deputy Commissioner Patton will take over from Chief Commissioner Graham Ashton AM, whose five-year term comes to an end later this month.

With more than 40 years’ experience across the full spectrum of policing, Shane Patton has been chosen as the best person to become the next Chief Commissioner and deliver a modern, agile and high-visibility police force that is engaged with the community and keeps Victorians safe.

His appointment follows an extensive recruitment process that included a search of both local and key international markets.

Starting as a police cadet in 1978, Deputy Commissioner Patton has had an impressive and varied career, rising through the ranks to take on crucial roles in the Victoria Police Executive Command, including Deputy Commissioner – Specialist Operations and his current role as Deputy Commissioner – Regional Operations.

In those roles he has directed regional operations across the state, including through the public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic and recent bushfires, set up Victoria Police’s Counter Terrorism Command, and taken significant actions to address serious and organised crime.

Since his appointment in 2015, Chief Commissioner Graham Ashton AM has made an extraordinary contribution to Victoria Police, overseeing the single biggest expansion and modernisation of the force in its 167-year history and raising the priority on mental health within the force.

His leadership of the organisation has been exceptional, especially through the recent tragic loss of four Victoria Police members on the Eastern Freeway, the 2019/20 Victorian bushfires and during the coronavirus pandemic.

Under the Victoria Police Act, the Chief Commissioner is appointed by the Governor in Council for a five year-term.

Quotes attributable to Premier Daniel Andrews

“Shane Patton is a strong leader with more than four decades experience in policing and is the best person to lead Victoria Police over the next term.”

“I thank Graham Ashton for his exceptional service to Victoria over the past five years – he should be enormously proud of all he has achieved for the force and for the Victorian community.”

Quotes attributable to Minister for Police and Emergency Services Lisa Neville

“Shane Patton has enormous experience within the Victoria Police family and is undoubtedly the right person to lead the force through another important period.”

“I will have much more to say about Graham at the appropriate time – but he leaves an enormous legacy at Victoria Police and I thank him for his incredible leadership over the last five years.””

Source: https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/victorias-next-police-chief-commissioner-appointed/

Note 102 – ‘I don’t see how we can be separate’: Shorten backs mandatory jabs for MPs

by James Massola – October 3, 2021 — 5.00am

“Former Labor leader Bill Shorten has thrown his support behind mandatory COVID-19 vaccines for all federal MPs, declaring “true leadership requires doing yourself what you ask others to do”.

He is the most senior MP from any of the major parties to back mandatory vaccination for federal MPs after Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews announced more than 1 million workers in the state – including MPs, judges, faith leaders and personal trainers – had to get at least one jab in the next two weeks or be banned from their workplace.”

Source: https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/i-don-t-see-how-we-can-be-separate-shorten-backs-mandatory-jabs-for-mps-20211001-p58wka.html

Note 103 – Revealed: Scott Morrison’s little-known work on the Christian Brethren church (14 April 2021)

During one of my MANY phone screens for employment, I was advised that the Senior Managers of a particular company were members of the Christian Brethren. The information was provided over the phone in such a way that there seemed to be an interest in how I would react to such feedback. Personally, I found the information to be a little ‘odd’ in lieu of the subject matter of the conversation.

So, upon completion of the phone screen I “Googled” the words ‘Christian Brethren’ and what do you know… there was my old mate (again) Scott Morrison…

Source: https://www.crikey.com.au/2021/04/14/scott-morrison-thesis-christian-bretheren/

Note 104 – the Victoria Police & Masonic order connection

During the initial phases of COVID restriction enforcement I observed many of the young VicPol Officers interacting with the general public whilst deliberately having one of the hands “hidden” in their hi-vis vest.

Also, it was observed by many that the website copshop.com.au had a “Freemasons Mask – Navy” for sale for $9.95. This item has since been removed from this website.

This behaviour is indicative of those whom were VERY sure of themselves during the initial phases of the PLANdemic, however as things began to go off the rails (for the PLAN) in lieu of the general public not being as compliant as required, references to the Masonic order via VicPol affiliate sites and Facebook pages were ‘disappeared’.

It should be noted that there is a strong Masonic presence in the Power industry, namely AGL Loy Yang in the Latrobe Valley which is another reason why I was not surprised they were ‘selected’ to ‘host’ “Operation Magpie” for the Victoria Police and Australian Army in early Nov 2019.

Note 105 – CRIMES ACT 1958 – SECT 316 (VIC) – Unlawful oaths to commit treason, murder etc.

S. 316(1) amended by Nos 9576 s. 11(1), 49/1991 s. 119(1)
(Sch. 2 item 57), 48/1997
s. 60(1)(Sch. 1 item 86(a)).

(1) Every person who—

S. 316(1)(a) amended by No. 9019 s. 2(1)(Sch. item 38).

(a) administers or is present at and consents to the administering of any oath or engagement in the nature of an oath purporting to bind the person who takes it to commit treason or murder; or

(b) takes any such oath or engagement not being compelled to do so; or

(c) induces or attempts to induce any person to take any such oath or engagement—

shall be guilty of an indictable offence, and shall be liable to level 5 imprisonment (10 years maximum).

Source: http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/ca195882/s316.html

Note 106 – Business owners will have right to reject unvaccinated in order to protect customers and business says Deputy PM

Australia’s Deputy Prime Minister has said businesses will be able to reject those who aren’t vaccinated to protect themselves and their customers.

1 August 2021

“Australia’s Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce has said people who own businesses will have the right to reject patrons who haven’t been vaccinated.

Mr Joyce told Sky News vaccines may provide more freedoms when business owners look to protect their businesses and customers.

“People in private enterprise are going to say look I’ve got rights here too,” the deputy prime minister said.”

Source: https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/business-owners-will-have-right-to-reject-unvaccinated-in-order-to-protect-customers-and-business-says-deputy-pm/news-story/10b3140b8692804354aa980e1c137cf8

Note 107 – Daniel Andrews delivers victory speech | 2022 Victorian Election | 9 News Australia

During his 2022 victory speech, Daniel Andrews thought it appropriate to make the claim that “Vaccines work!” pertaining to the COVID-19 “vaccines”.

Daniel Andrews is potentially the greatest pathological liar in Australian political history. It is important to understand for someone like Daniel Andrews who operates per “the END ALWAYS justifies the means” lying (pathologically) is simply part of his political tool kit.

None the less, his pandemic related commentary delivered during his 2022 “Victory” speech should be considered material evidence for the MAHA Class action.

Source: https://youtu.be/onQ4gyBr-DI